Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cynthia Frelund with an interesting analytics look at CJ Stroud and Bryce Young


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Like many I lean toward Stroud with his bigger frame and quick accurate passes which fits the offense I think we will be running. That doesn't mean Young won't be a good choice as well. Just that you may have to adapt the gameplan to account for his size and height more than you do Stroud who is more prototypical in size.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

let's not overstate the issues with Bryce Young's height getting in the way of executing basic plays on offense. it will present some challenges but it's literally been done by other quarterbacks who are similar in height. and the skills those quarterbacks needed to function with their height, those are exactly the skills that Young possesses. in fact many would say they are some of his stronger attributes.

height just isn't the primary (or secondary) concern with him. frame is. and in my opinion, I wonder if his arm is quite strong enough to play in the NFL like it did in college. we've seen QBs with elite traits but middle-of-the-pack arms get exposed in the NFL.

still love him, though, and I go back and forth over who I'd prefer. Stroud is the box-checking QB who you wonder if he'll ever truly ascend into a top tier NFL quarterback. Young is the it-factor QB who you wonder if his skills will play the same way at the next level.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, Frelend could be BSing the NFL world with most of her "analytics" but she does make some good points here that give us reason to consider different perspectives.  For example, if Young is able to overcome his size and stay safe, the next question is "how?"  A deeper drop.  She mentions tackles, and that is a good point.  A deeper drop makes the path the QB more linear for edge rushers, who are currently challenged with their bends.  A deep drop lessens the angle, given the OTs the challenge of facing more power and speed.  Although the difference is slight, it can be significant.  To compensate, the OT also has a more linear drop, (an ideal OT drop is approximately 45 degrees outward) and this new challenge might cause that drop to increase to 55 degrees, for example).  That reduces the size of the pocket because it causes the initial contact to be inside a smaller pocket. 

I think it was Byron Bell and Mike Remmers who were dropping at nearly the same angle of the QB--straight back--forcing Cam to step up or spin out.  Problem was, Cam was not that deep and his athleticism could extend plays.  However, Frelend hits on a great point without getting into the details.  The impact on the OTs.

In other words, if all this is true, it places a tremendous pressure on your OTs--something that may not be exposed in college, but in the NFL, it will be exploited--in my opinion. 

If you want to read a VERY THOROUGH statistical breakdown of "Time to Throw" (TTT) this Colts article is second to none:

https://www.stampedeblue.com/2021/10/16/22727432/fine-lets-talk-about-time-to-throw

Based on these stats, it sure seems as if the most pass attempts are between 2.4 and 2.7 seconds.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

In my opinion, Frelend could be BSing the NFL world with most of her "analytics" but she does make some good points here that give us reason to consider different perspectives.  For example, if Young is able to overcome his size and stay safe, the next question is "how?"  A deeper drop.  She mentions tackles, and that is a good point.  A deeper drop makes the path the QB more linear for edge rushers, who are currently challenged with their bends.  A deep drop lessens the angle, given the OTs the challenge of facing more power and speed.  Although the difference is slight, it can be significant.  To compensate, the OT also has a more linear drop, (an ideal OT drop is approximately 45 degrees outward) and this new challenge might cause that drop to increase to 55 degrees, for example).  That reduces the size of the pocket because it causes the initial contact to be inside a smaller pocket. 

I think it was Byron Bell and Mike Remmers who were dropping at nearly the same angle of the QB--straight back--forcing Cam to step up or spin out.  Problem was, Cam was not that deep and his athleticism could extend plays.  However, Frelend hits on a great point without getting into the details.  The impact on the OTs.

In other words, if all this is true, it places a tremendous pressure on your OTs--something that may not be exposed in college, but in the NFL, it will be exploited--in my opinion. 

If you want to read a VERY THOROUGH statistical breakdown of "Time to Throw" (TTT) this Colts article is second to none:

https://www.stampedeblue.com/2021/10/16/22727432/fine-lets-talk-about-time-to-throw

Based on these stats, it sure seems as if the most pass attempts are between 2.4 and 2.7 seconds.

If you think that about Freuland then you probably should do some research on her.  Her background is pretty nuts and she was at the forefront of nfl and analytics. 

 

She is not one to skew or make up her data for a "hot take".

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Ive said for months that with stroud we win the south and its not even close.

The south is so weak right now we could win it with Andy Dalton. Not that he's a better QB than Carr, but the situation is much better here than there.

I go back and forth between the top 2-3 QBs as to who I think we should draft, but I'll stick with Stroud being the safest bet to be a continual winner and owning the NFCS. In my head, I think he's the better pick.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

The south is so weak right now we could win it with Andy Dalton. Not that he's a better QB than Carr, but the situation is much better here than there.

I go back and forth between the top 2-3 QBs as to who I think we should draft, but I'll stick with Stroud being the safest bet to be a continual winner and owning the NFCS. In my head, I think he's the better pick.

I mean I wouldnt go that far lol but I could see it.  Just see us a juggernaut in the south around midseason with stroud

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, rayzor said:

My reaction if we draft these guys:

Young: Damn, he's going to be fun to watch.

AR: Damn, he's going to be incredible in a couple years

Stroud: Damn, we're going to start winning

Levis: Dammit.

Any one of them should have our fan base excited, but at the end of the day winning is the most important.  That's what I learn Stroud out of the 3.  Lowest risk with still a very high ceiling.  No one should be upset if he is the pick. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Those analytics are fascinating. I'm still a Stroud guy but if they get Young I won't be mad. 

3.02 seconds in the NFL is an eternity to hold on to the ball. Add in his lack of arm strength and you're shrinking the field vertically and horizontally depending on the hash as well.

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean I wouldnt go that far lol but I could see it.  Just see us a juggernaut in the south around midseason with stroud

Agreed. It's not that we would be unbeatable with the other guys, including Dalton. It's more a lack of respect I have for the rest of the division. It's garbage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

In my opinion, Frelend could be BSing the NFL world with most of her "analytics" but she does make some good points here that give us reason to consider different perspectives.  For example, if Young is able to overcome his size and stay safe, the next question is "how?"  A deeper drop.  She mentions tackles, and that is a good point.  A deeper drop makes the path the QB more linear for edge rushers, who are currently challenged with their bends.  A deep drop lessens the angle, given the OTs the challenge of facing more power and speed.  Although the difference is slight, it can be significant.  To compensate, the OT also has a more linear drop, (an ideal OT drop is approximately 45 degrees outward) and this new challenge might cause that drop to increase to 55 degrees, for example).  That reduces the size of the pocket because it causes the initial contact to be inside a smaller pocket. 

I think it was Byron Bell and Mike Remmers who were dropping at nearly the same angle of the QB--straight back--forcing Cam to step up or spin out.  Problem was, Cam was not that deep and his athleticism could extend plays.  However, Frelend hits on a great point without getting into the details.  The impact on the OTs.

In other words, if all this is true, it places a tremendous pressure on your OTs--something that may not be exposed in college, but in the NFL, it will be exploited--in my opinion. 

If you want to read a VERY THOROUGH statistical breakdown of "Time to Throw" (TTT) this Colts article is second to none:

https://www.stampedeblue.com/2021/10/16/22727432/fine-lets-talk-about-time-to-throw

Based on these stats, it sure seems as if the most pass attempts are between 2.4 and 2.7 seconds.

Chiefs LT left, and many thought it was because it's very hard to play T for a QB who loves to extend plays...ala Young.

I don't like having to play out of the gun, and I think that Young will need that to survive/thrive at the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

3.02 seconds in the NFL is an eternity to hold on to the ball. Add in his lack of arm strength and you're shrinking the field vertically and horizontally depending on the hash as well.

This is my fear.  Young plays a little like Mahommes....but he doesn't have the size, nor the arm strength for it to translate easily to the NFL.

We shall see.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Any one of them should have our fan base excited, but at the end of the day winning is the most important.  That's what I learn Stroud out of the 3.  Lowest risk with still a very high ceiling.  No one should be upset if he is the pick. 

Agreed. And the fierce debate between camps, especially Young and Stroud....I think it's just funny but completely unnecessary. It's such an easy time to make a choice. I seem to be leaning more frequently towards Stroud, but I'll be stoked if its any of those top three. We win quicker if it's Stroud or Young, but AR is going to be an absolute stud in the right situation.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just looking at this moment in time, rather than holding off until we see something for it, I'd have to give it a B+/A-. We added a lot of players and a lot of potential. We may have reached a bit with our first pick, but the simple move to make it at the end of the first round gave us a shot to make it last a bit longer if he really blossoms here. That was a pretty smart move and had a lot to do with Morgan and Beane's relationship I think.  Picking up an injured running back in the second sounds like a foolish move, but honestly, it's a solid gamble. We know what the floor would be on the pick, that he might never play at a professional level due to that injury. And honestly, that is the floor on any pick you make. The ceiling on the guy could potentially be immense. He was outstanding on a mighty fine team that was pass heavy and he doesn't have a lot of mileage. If that knee heals up completely (and we have a lot of experience with that in Carolina), he could be a massive steal and just what Bryce needs. There are a lot of people harping on our LB pick, but man, I always take it with a grain of salt when folks decry a player's "football intelligence." It's one of those criticisms that is easy to lodge against a young guy, but really hard to quantify. It might be nothing. His reputation for being a hard hitter and instinctual tackler are more important I think. He's going to have a good mentor in Shaq in the LB room and there's an institutional strength in our LB corps that could give him quite a boost. Our TE pick in the fourth may very well be the steal of the draft. I think we're going to see some serious production out of him. I'm hoping for something Olsen-like. He's definitely an upgrade to what we have now. And from there, well, the tea leaves get a little harder to read. I think Morgan did well with the trading and he cast a wide net for positions. We're going to have to see how it all shakes out, but just based on the three days of picks and the work that went into them, it was a good performance, better than I expected.
    • The 5th year option wasn't even considered.  I don't care what Dan says. They traded up because they got wind someone was interested in Legette. Whether that interest was real or made up is unknown. 
    • Yeah man, Beane really fuged us for that... *Checks notes* 5th round pick. fug, how will we ever recover?
×
×
  • Create New...