Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young's built sturdier than Stroud per BMI


MechaZain
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

those who are worried about his durability are always going to be worried about it.

he could be playing for 7 years before he misses time and you'll hear them all say, "you see, i was right! i'm always right. you all should have listened to me!"

I wouldn't go that far 😄

I will say though that I'm probably going to be crossing myself every time he takes a hit...and I'm not Catholic 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just asked a magic 8-ball website if the panthers should choose Bryce Young and it said "Yes, definitely." I then asked if they should choose C. J. Stroud and it said, "Ask again later."

I dunno what this means, but it has about as much significance as all this other crap combined.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Not building a workout routine here just comparing two guys. I think it's more accurate than the Huddle eye test.

But you're comparing 2 guys using a metric that doesn't accurately measure athletes due to their higher % of muscle mass. Doesn't matter if it's more accurate than the Huddle eye test or not, it's still not accurate. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rayzor said:

those who are worried about his durability are always going to be worried about it.

he could be playing for 7 years before he misses time and you'll hear them all say, "you see, i was right! i'm always right. you all should have listened to me!"

The game threads are gonna get old so fast with the freak outs i'm sure.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

those who are worried about his durability are always going to be worried about it.

he could be playing for 7 years before he misses time and you'll hear them all say, "you see, i was right! i'm always right. you all should have listened to me!"

Actually,  7 years in he would prove me wrong about the durability concerns. Well past it, 7 years he would be on a second contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "YOUNGSTERS" are desperately trying to convince us that less is more.

Dumb move. Not big enough for the NFL. He should get into bowling. What's next?? The best 5'10" volleyballer?! It won't work he's not playing against future salesmen or accountants the NFL is full of physical freaks, ya boy , sooner than later will get smashed.

If he were my son I'd be excited for him but that reality that he's fighting out of his weight class would be terrifying. Some fans don't care they just want to "see" him do it.

I DON'T want to see it happen, but it's likely, that's why I rather it happen in another uniform.

Heard the Texans like Will Anderson so all the Bryce hype and gamesmanship may be for not.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Here he's still rocking a little bit of his combine dad bodHDcPRSLb.thumb.jpeg.e1162a7c8985ba703b20ec48755754d8.jpeg

Look how sweaty he is. We should measure how much sweat Young v Stroud had on their pro day. /s

 

Seriously tho can't wait till Carolina picks. Whoever they choose. I don't care who it is. Just let the madness stop.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

7 games would do it for me

I would like for him to make it threw the whole season healthy. I dont think 7 games will say too much as im looking at from a standpoint of how much punishment can he take before getting a injury. I dont think he gonna take one hit and get hurt significantly that quick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...