Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the S2 TEST take CJ out?


Ivory Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Not sure how it has been validated, except people are saying Brock Purdy is the poster boy for it.  Still, it is an interesting concept.  In fact, they should put a mini S2 in your car and if you don't pass it after a certain hour it calls an Uber for you.

There was some interesting info in The Athletic piece on it back in February. This for example

The company recently looked at 27 starting quarterbacks. (Some of the older veterans like Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers had entered the league before S2 began testing in 2015 and there are no scores for them; Brees took the test while already playing in the NFL.) Of that group, 13 had a career passer rating above 90. The average S2 score of those players was the 91st percentile. Those with passer ratings below 90 had much lower test results.

“Those 14 guys, the average score was in the low 60s,” Ally said.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Never even heard of some of these tests before we moved up to 1. Now the draft Richardson camp are saying we HAVE to draft Richardson now. 

League likes to overreact.
 

The fact that Purdy was the last pick of the draft yet did well in this test & well with 49ers has been a big endorsement for that test.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

I hope CJ makes 15 straight pro bowls and makes these people look stupid. It’s disgusting how people put these kids business out there like that, if it is even true. No way to verify it. 

people were just complaining how it was “poor journalistic integrity” to put Young’s score out and not Stroud’s.

what is the right answer?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

If we've already heard about Levis and Richardson's scores idk why we would not have Stroud's. If he scored low what's the number? Seems like there are some draft games being played.

I think its up to the prospects to release them or something, but then why does Zuerline get to if thats the case. Bizarre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That they've been testing players since 2015 and we've never heard poo about it until now suggests teams don't put much stock in it. It would have come up by now. It's just because of Purdy that it's being touted. 

Give us all the results if you expect us to drool over it.

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stan786 said:

I think its up to the prospects to release them or something, but then why does Zuerline get to if thats the case. Bizarre.

It's a measured release from S2 I'm sure....for marketing themselves 

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, csx said:

That they've been testing players since 2015 and we've never heard poo about it until now suggests teams don't put much stock in it. It would have come up by now. It's just because of Purdy that it's being touted. 

Give us all the results if you expect us to drool over it.

I agree.
 

i think Purdy doing well after being “mr irrelevant” gave the test more credence. 
 

now teams are gonna over react to it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Not sure how it has been validated, except people are saying Brock Purdy is the poster boy for it.  Still, it is an interesting concept.  In fact, they should put a mini S2 in your car and if you don't pass it after a certain hour it calls an Uber for you.

Joe Burrow, Pat Mahomes, Josh Allen are the poster boys for it. Each had the highest score in their class and each were considered elite scores. 84473742-14DE-4435-B2A7-B4E6A85963F6.thumb.jpeg.26ef4d13f2283136bc7b335c694b9041.jpeg

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a newer article at the S2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2023/03/21/nfl-s2-cognition-quarterbacks/


After a few years of vetting, S2 expanded to a small group of teams, including the Bills, Indianapolis Colts and Kansas City Chiefs. It later began to work with up to two teams per division, including the Panthers and Washington Commanders.

 

Among the 117 quarterbacks S2 had tested up to the 2022 draft, the 13 with career passer ratings above 90 averaged an S2 score (91) that was 40 percentile points higher than those with career passer ratings below 90. Those top-tier quarterbacks tested significantly better in seeing the full field (tracking capacity), picking up on tendencies (instinctive learning), filtering through “if-then” rules during plays (decision complexity) and focusing amid stimuli (distraction control).

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...