Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young scored 98 out of 99 on his S2 cognitive test

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Towelboy Enthusiast

Towelboy

Posted
Posted

This owner has invested heavily in analytics, but anyone paying attention could see Young is physically limited with no physically elite skills. This team disregarded over 100 years of data because Young is a football savant. However, football is a big man’s game. A QB not only has to make the right reads, but he also must be able to throw all the routes. I don’t believe Young has the skills to do that in the NFL. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I mean, there's probably folks sitting in boardrooms who could score very well on the S2 test but they lack the physical ability to play QB in the NFL. At some point there are simply physical prerequisites that no amount of mental ability will be able to overcome. I hope Bryce is on the right side of that line.

there are mouth breathers on this forum who could score well on that test. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I was really hoping he’d show up to camp looking like he added some real weight over the offseason. It was a real let down when he showed up looking the same. I would’ve settled for some newbie gains but we didn’t even get that 

It looked like he was just concerned about the weigh in and not the reality of what he was really going to face. It jives with the preseason approach and thinking a rookie QB is fine if you don't establish the run or even use the more effecting RB after the first game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Towelboy said:

This owner has invested heavily in analytics, but anyone paying attention could see Young is physically limited with no physically elite skills. This team disregarded over 100 years of data because Young is a football savant. However, football is a big man’s game. A QB not only has to make the right reads, but he also must be able to throw all the routes. I don’t believe Young has the skills to do that in the NFL. 

sometimes the NFL/sports comes down to not playing by the textbook.    We wouldn't of made either Super Bowl if Jake and Cam just went about playing smart.  Hell, look at Mahomes.  You need a QB willing to take the proper amount of risks.   Not saying Young can't get there.  But he has never really been that style QB. 

Risk is part of sports. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Wow looks like the season of Huddle manchildren bumping old ass threads to brag about what big smart football boys they are has arrived early this year

Huddlers = manchildren for bumping "old ass threads" ( from this past offseason ) is worse than putting stock into a test before the kids play a snap in the NFL? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Coming from someone who was team Stroud, I would be very careful about taking victory laps after week 3 in terms of draft prospects.  There was a time when Mods cracked down on bumping old threads now I login and there are like 4-5 all at the top....

Mods? The mods are doing half this stuff. That proudiddy guy starts half this poo. he literally has a thread on the front page telling everyone to stop being fans of this team 2 games into our ROOKIE qb career. its unreal

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • Anybodyhome
      Cellphones

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...