Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*apparently false scores leaked* STROUD SCORES 18% ON S2 TEST (or maybe not)


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

This place will explode if they do not take Young.  They will sound like Jets fans with all the booing and predictions of failure for whoever is taken.  As much as I love Young I'm still not 100% sure he's the pick.

Not being a jerk, just being curious, why do you think he’s not the sure fire pick for us? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I'm eager to see if this is the lowest S2 scored since they've introduced it. That seems absurdly low lol

 

It’s a percentile test. If the score is true it means 18 % of all football players that have taken the test has scored lower than him while 72% have scored higher. 

 

Cognitive test aren’t graded like a grade school test. 

Edited by Beast_3000
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

Not being a jerk, just being curious, why do you think he’s not the sure fire pick for us? 

Can't speak for snow, but I would say while Young is probably the pick, you never know until you hear the name read.

(that's why the draft always makes me nervous) 😣

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and the s2 guys said all the qbs did well, somebody gots some explaining to do

What I thought too but I thought about it and what is he gonna say? “Well they all did pretty well except this one guy, I’m not sure how he wipes his ass or eats without assistance”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah. Very well could be leaked by the Texans or some other top team to prep their fanbase for passing on him. Who knows?

I don’t get why it’s a big deal that it is leaked to the public. The team’s already had the info, it’s not like it was hidden from them. This is just for us fans to have insight to why someone could/would drop.

 

cc: @vorbisbc this is a good topic for discussion 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the shtick with Bob McGinn's prospect rankings (which are VERY thorough and often go against conventional narratives in insightful ways) is that he polls scouts from all over the league, and grants them anonymity. he includes their thoughts verbatim in his rankings, where he puts prospects into tiers.

I think most of us can understand how the anonymity approach can be really interesting, but also how it can be weaponized or misused to rapidly change perceptions of a prospect in the week leading up to the draft. maybe the truth is being told, but maybe a team feels like if they can make a prospect slide on draft weekend, they can get a good deal out of it. the thing is, we just don't know which is which, thanks to the anonymity thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and the s2 guys said all the qbs did well, somebody gots some explaining to do

My only thought on the S2 guy is if he was leaking bad scores it may look bad on him in terms of mass adoption of his product. Though they get leaked anyway clearly by the NFL teams, so probably irrelevant.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stan786 said:

My only thought on the S2 guy is if he was leaking bad scores it may look bad on him in terms of mass adoption of his product. Though they get leaked anyway clearly by the NFL teams, so probably irrelevant.

well now if its a true score of 18% the s2 dudes look kindof like buffoons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
    • I hate Marchand, but if he became a free agent.....
×
×
  • Create New...