Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tom Pelissero compares quarterbacks

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PantherKyle Mentor

PantherKyle

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, t96 said:

We take Bryce, Stroud goes to Indy at 4, AR to Seahawks at 5 and then I think the Pats are gonna trade up with the Raiders by giving away Mac Jones + more and then take Levis at 7.

Doesn't really make sense for the Raiders. Signed Jimmy G, no reason to have Mac as a backup. Drafting a rookie to sit behind Jimmy makes more sense if they want to add a QB. I could see LV actually moving up or sitting pat for a QB. 

As far as Hooker, I wouldn't take him in round one. Offensive system seemed very college-flukey and he is going to be 26 in the fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

Doesn't really make sense for the Raiders. Signed Jimmy G, no reason to have Mac as a backup. Drafting a rookie to sit behind Jimmy makes more sense if they want to add a QB. I could see LV actually moving up or sitting pat for a QB. 

As far as Hooker, I wouldn't take him in round one. Offensive system seemed very college-flukey and he is going to be 26 in the fall.

Mac is a guy McDaniels has already had success with and he could use a bit of a reset and some further development sitting behind Jimmy G for a year or 2 and a good insurance option for when (not if) Jimmy G gets hurt. He's not much older than Levis and is younger than Hooker. Plus there have already been reports that the Raiders could be interested in Mac. They'd get draft picks too. 

 

Just a prediction, probably won't happen but it wouldn't surprise me at all.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherKyle Mentor

PantherKyle

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, t96 said:

Mac is a guy McDaniels has already had success with and he could use a bit of a reset and some further development sitting behind Jimmy G for a year or 2 and a good insurance option for when (not if) Jimmy G gets hurt. He's not much older than Levis and is younger than Hooker. Plus there have already been reports that the Raiders could be interested in Mac. They'd get draft picks too. 

 

Just a prediction, probably won't happen but it wouldn't surprise me at all.

All fair points. I'll come back and pie for sure if it hits!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherOnTheProwl1523 Mentor

PantherOnTheProwl1523

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, t96 said:

We take Bryce, Stroud goes to Indy at 4, AR to Seahawks at 5 and then I think the Pats are gonna trade up with the Raiders by giving away Mac Jones + more and then take Levis at 7.

I posted this in another thread. The Patriots seem to always see what they like and go for that particular player.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/04/20/sports/patriots-had-kentucky-quarterback-will-levis-predraft-visit-whats-up-with-that/?et_rid=1325586788&s_campaign=

Edited by PantherOnTheProwl1523
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Garrett Wilson is doubtful

      By CRA · Posted

      Technically speaking, Fields has been a better QB than Bryce Young in the NFL.  I mean it’s bottom rung comparing by BY isn’t better.  Thats what I don’t get about the talk this week.  We don’t have a QB edge 
    • tukafan21
      Garrett Wilson is doubtful

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Might be different against a team with no legitimate pass catching options outside of their rookie TE though.  Their #1 WR tomorrow has 8 catches this season, next best WR receptions number this year is 4. If we can't defend that while Horn travels with their TE, then we have some serious problems.   Maybe we don't end up doing that in the end, but it's probably how I'd be scheming up the defense tomorrow when they have only 1 non RB pass catching option.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2025 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I fought sleep to stay awake just to watch that fumble on the goal line as we were going in for the go ahead score and said fug it, I'm going to bed. I've seen this movie before. I know how this ends. This bullshit of having California teams in conference with east coast teams is trash. That game probably didn't end until 2:30AM. Hell, it was 2AM at the time of the fumble and there was still 3+ minutes to play. In conference games being played into the 2AM hour for local audiences is terrible for the game. And the worst rule in football really does need fixed. Fumbling through the endzone or a fumble recovers by the D in the end zone should not result in a touch back and the ball on the 20. Fumbling through the endzone should not be a turnover. Fumbling out of bounds isn't a turnover anywhere else on the field. That should be the offense's ball on the one yard line. If the D recovers it in the endzone it should be the D's ball on the one yard line. Everyone knows this and everyone talks about it so just fix it already. If Cal was getting the ball at the goal line instead of out to the 20 I would've kept watching. That's a completely different scenario than the ball at the 20.
×
×
  • Create New...