Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Simms top 40 QB's


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I can't take you serious. Im not even sure if you know what a diva WR is.

 

Bro just naming the best WR's in the league and calling them diva's.

 

 

All of those receivers have had locker room episodes, sidelines eruptions, or cussed out their QB in front of the team.

 

The definition of diva is subjective, but the behaviors all of the above have shown… are diva like in my opinion. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

Lot of scouts had Richardson #1, CJ #2 and Young #3. 

 

I'll also add that if Young was 6-2 or taller and weighed 230ish, that wouldn't be the case. He'd be a clear cut #1 most years with prototype size 

Maybe on madden.

But in the NFL.  Little to none did.

 

”Affer talking to all my sources with all the teams across the league.  There is a Consensus QB1 in this draft (Bryce)”

- Daniel Jeremiah, former NFL scout, current NFL draft insider for NFL network etc

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

All of those receivers have had locker room episodes, sidelines eruptions, or cussed out their QB in front of the team.

 

The definition of diva is subjective, but the behaviors all of the above have shown… are diva like in my opinion. 

I do think the diva WR era is a recognizable era/window in the NFL.   I could see it returning though.  Especially as the league continues to become a passing league, social media, personal brand building etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

 

I was pretty sure Anderson was going to be drafted early, but I agree with Simms that Anderson isn't as good of a prospect as he was built up to be.  I think if the Cardinals scheme him to the QB he will put up good numbers.  But if they expect him to beat tackles on his own week in and week out, they are going to be disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SazmoRanger said:

I disagree. At least USC had Carson Palmer who actually had a pretty good career. Sure he’s not a HOFer, but he had 10+ year career in the NFL as a starter. Ohio State hasn’t produced a QB of that caliber AT ALL, in any round. 
 

Either way, it’s pretty interesting to have two power house schools like that who practically never produce any NFL talent at the QB position.  

Palmer was decent but Leinart, Sanchez and Darnold have been terrible and were all drafted higher. Jury is still out on Fields, so he and Palmer potentially cancel each other out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CRA said:

Chris Simms had Zach Wilson ahead of Trevor Lawrence.  Mond ahead of Fields. 

Simms has always embraced throwing rankings out meant to generate clicks 

Exactly.  Did you see his edge rankings for this draft?  He entirely throws stuff out there to get attention.   Anyone who thinks AR is going to be a better qb than Young this coming season are probably pushing for clicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

All of those receivers have had locker room episodes, sidelines eruptions, or cussed out their QB in front of the team.

 

The definition of diva is subjective, but the behaviors all of the above have shown… are diva like in my opinion. 

Tom Brady cussed out his teammates and refs his entire career.

 

Nobody called him a diva. 

 

So you basically think most of the players in the NFL are divas because those actions happen every day. It's football bro did you not play in high school?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I’m not mad at all. It’s just a silly thing to say. It’s serves zero relevance to actuality and it’s assumption that can’t be validated.

Somebody said Bryce was the #1 QB in college. I pointed out Williams was better. So it was relevant to the conversation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Article:  The Rams must love rookie defensive lineman Braden Fiske, because they paid the Panthers a fortune to move up in the second round and draft him. To move up from No. 52 to No. 39 and draft Fiske, the Rams gave up the 155th overall pick in this year’s draft, as well as the Rams’ second-round pick in next year’s draft. That’s a rare price to pay, for a move up of just 13 spots in the second round. In fact, according to Seth Walder of ESPN Analytics, the Rams overpaid by the most any team has overpaid to move up on Day Two of the draft in at least the last six years. Ultimately, the Rams used two second-round picks and a fifth-round pick on Fiske. That’s a lot to spend. For the Panthers, it’s a great deal that nets them a second-round pick next year in addition to Jonathon Brooks, the running back the Panthers drafted after making another trade that packaged the two picks they got from the Rams. The Panthers didn’t have a 2025 second-round pick, having shipped it to Chicago in last year’s Bryce Young trade, but now they have a second-round pick after making a good trade on Friday. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/rams-paid-a-big-price-in-trade-with-panthers-to-move-up-13-spots-for-braden-fiske
    • Yeah I don’t think I’d like this guy outside, he doesn’t fit that in the NFL.  I think he needs to stick to nickel and ST to help the defense, he’d probably contribute. I think he’d be a liability outside. I like him okay though, looking forward to seeing him.  Actually that is probably how I feel about all the picks, I like them okay and am looking forward to seeing them. I feel like they were taken for a good reason; though I may not see it yet. One shouldn’t expect to go straight down the line hit every one, butI think we’ll hit on a couple of guys in this group. 4 would be great.  
    • i know, but to a degree to can still apply, imo. yes, the guy is a unicorn. crazy circumstances and situations i think kept him away from opportunity to prove themselves for a longer period of time. and in that he and cam are similar. cam took a couple years before he was put in a situation to show what he could do given then opportunity. same wit XL. different circumstances, for sure, but really they were drafted based on one one year of production where they looked dominant. does that mean he's going to be the cam newton of WRS? probably not.  one of the arguments against cam was that he had only one year of "real" production at a high level and those arguments were furthered by the lack of people who had transitioned into a legit starter after so little starting experience.  they were/are both unicorns. 
×
×
  • Create New...