Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank Reich: Bryce Young’s command was “10 out of 10” on first day of OTAs


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, poundaway said:

OTAs have gotten going on Monday with No. 1 pick Bryce Young taking the majority of first-team snaps at the Panthers’ first spring practice.

Head coach Frank Reich was complimentary of all three quarterbacks on the roster in his post-practice press conference, saying Young, Andy Dalton, and Matt Corral displayed strong decision-making and ball placement.

But this board says Corral can't be developed and will just take snaps away from Young. Strange. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I'm liking our QB room.  Young is the QB our staff wanted to lead this team, Dalton is a decent vet/solid backup, and Corral is a young project QB with potential.  I hope we keep all 3.

With teams now being allowed to carry a 3rd qb on game day as a 47th active player it should be a no brainer. He's going to know the play book, we traded away a pick for him, we wouldn't get anything worthwhile in trading him away. I imagine he's going to play a lot of the preseason game snaps since Dalton won't really need them. Curious is Bryce will get more preseason time since he's a rookie or if they'll just let him play a half of game 2 like most other QB1's play now. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Young is the #1 QB my man.

 

Why are you so focused on Matt Corral development. That indeed is strange...

I'm not. I'm pointing out how stupid the Corral haters are.  There was never a good reason to cut him, but I bet you wanted that. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

But this board says Corral can't be developed and will just take snaps away from Young. Strange. 

Not strange. 

You have a finite number of snaps. Those limited snaps can be divided any way you choose to prepare the number one pick in the draft (whom you mortgaged a meaningful chunk of future draft capital to get) for his rookie season as you anticipate he will be the face of your franchise for the foreseeable future. Every snap that goes to Corral is a snap of preparation Young will not have.

It's not that Corral can't be developed, it's that organizational priorities rightly regard developing him as a low enough priority in the grand scheme of things that his share of the finite snaps should be trivial. None of this is any comment on Corral's potential beyond the obvious fact he's a third round drafted qb in his second year who looked god awful in the only action he's seen to date. HIs ceiling and odds of success are extremely low compared to Young, therefore he shouldn't be invested in through finite snaps.

Arguments to the contrary fly in the face of the weight of historical evidence regarding later round drafted qb's vs number one picks. No one is a guaranteed success, but the number one pick has far greater odds than any random third rounder, so that's where your focus is as an organization.

Nothing strange to see here.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Not strange. 

You have a finite number of snaps. Those limited snaps can be divided any way you choose to prepare the number one pick in the draft (whom you mortgaged a meaningful chunk of future draft capital to get) for his rookie season as you anticipate he will be the face of your franchise for the foreseeable future. Every snap that goes to Corral is a snap of preparation Young will not have.

It's not that Corral can't be developed, it's that organizational priorities rightly regard developing him as a low enough priority in the grand scheme of things that his share of the finite snaps should be trivial. None of this is any comment on Corral's potential beyond the obvious fact he's a third round drafted qb in his second year who looked god awful in the only action he's seen to date. HIs ceiling and odds of success are extremely low compared to Young, therefore he shouldn't be invested in through finite snaps.

Arguments to the contrary fly in the face of the weight of historical evidence regarding later round drafted qb's vs number one picks. No one is a guaranteed success, but the number one pick has far greater odds than any random third rounder, so that's where your focus is as an organization.

Nothing strange to see here.

No QB plays 100% of the snaps in the offseason.  That's why there's a 1st team offense, 2nd team offense, 3rd team offense, etc.  It's not like we're going to be putting Bryce back there running plays with the 3rd string o-line/receivers who probably aren't even making the roster at the end of the day.

Once Bryce officially pulls away from Dalton in the QB1 "competition" and starts taking the dominant share of snaps with the 1st team offense, then it'd be more a case of taking snaps from Dalton and giving a significant portion of those to Corral.  Dalton is a 12-year vet, he doesn't need all those back-up snaps.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

one beneficial thing that could happen from a percentage of snaps in offseason practices going to someone other than Young, and this is probably uniquely true for Young, is that he will be able to see what the offense is doing from another perspective which will help him notice things that work well or, more importantly, work better when he is back on the field. 

granted, those instances need to be limited, but they will still be beneficial. he needs, though to be able to work with this OL and these receivers, TEs and RBs to get to a point of complete trust in each other. no doubt this will be more experienced during game situations, but the more trust in each other they have heading into week 1, the more likely it is for us to have success right out of the gate.

one thing to consider, though, in letting someone else take reps is to help ensure that his arm doesn't get worn out in a potentially much longer NFL season than he had in college. i think this is probably the case for all rookie QBs, though. it's going to take an adjustment to get used to a more rigorous and lengthy football season. you need to make sure he's still got gas when/if you get to the playoffs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're saying the same thing as I said.  Until Jordan becomes an active part of recruiting and funding, this school will continue to fall way behind.  But to say Michael Jordan or the Jordan brand doesn't matter anymore, which is what you said, is flat out wrong.  
    • I have not learnt my lesson and will always want Uber athletic profiles. Sorry, Im a whore about it.... Im not the right guy to defend Kenyon, I just have a understanding with this years draft, numbers, and panthers roster. He is more of "upside/project" and we are talking 19th pick here too.  I know about the years of all the mock drafts with TEs in them and I did want Pitts too.... Look I love the current TEs on the roster too, just this guy should be better than any of them at their best.  Right now I feel OT is the correct target, but panthers as a org are trying to win in 2026 than 2027. So tea leaves and all, Kenyon would help this year. You can even say flex him to slot for most of the snaps and think of tmac on smoke routes with Kenyon blocking for him. I just hate BY is the shooter..... warren, I would say he's the better prospect even without his rookie year, *but he was late bloomer like XL if Im right, plus age was 25ish?? Bears picked love above him, mainly cause of recs.  You can make a case that Kenyon is not a TE, but a moving weapon for offense that can be in the backfield, on the LOS, slot, and even X.... imean he's got XLs combine on some numbers.... He would be better to a offense mad scientist type...is that Dave? or is that bevell?? I think the Panthers should have him as a 19 pick, with others... 
    • That's one of the best power play games I've seen us have in a while.
×
×
  • Create New...