Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deandre Hopkins is a FA


Seltzer
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm torn. Theilen and Nuke would be the best WR tandem that I can remember in a long time us having but maybe a couple years too late. Adam and Nuke both got a bit of age on them. I think Adam will help the young guys but I worry another vet might take reps from our young guys.   I'd rather sign a corner with that money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Donald LaFell said:

Yeah I’m on this line of thought. I don’t think this team can get to a SB before young’s 1st contract is over so I think the next 2-3 years is about helping him develop and drafting well. 

What that's rough it seems like we're a big play WR and upgrade at DE away from real contention but that's how I see it. Maybe an upgrade at CB as well but those 3 positions are one off-season away. And realistically our DBs might suffice a year after DJax injury he'll probably be back to himself after this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, joemac said:

This is true, however outside of Kelce, KC's offense isnt exactly loaded with studs.  They just happen to have a transcendent QB. 

That was not the case when he was still young, as his contract gobbled up the cap he had to make do with just his one weapon and a bunch of jags situation he is in now. Get Hop on 1-year deal and convince him that he can prove he can stay healthy here and get his bag next season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we sign Hopkins, then we need to trade Chark for a CB, a DE, or move him down to 5th on the depth chart.

Next year with Hopkins isn't worth risking the development of TMJ and Mingo.

Now matter how much some people here scream it, we're not legitimate SB contenders this year with Hopkins, and the development of TMJ/Mingo is probably the biggest key to the 2023 season outside of Bryce's development.

The 3 of them are the future of this team, not Hopkins, not Chark, not Thielen, not even Sanders.  The future of our offense lies with our Bryce, our OL, and those two WRs.  Outside of those 3, some OL, and MAYBE Tremble if he breaks out, there isn't a single player on this offense that has any chance of being on this squad in 5 years and more likely not even 3.

Our prime SB window opens next year and is there for 3 years while on Bryce's rookie deal cap hit before an extension would kick-in in year 5.  Next year can't be an experimental year at WR, we need to either have the starters already on roster or make splashes in FA or trades.

And if we sign Hopkins, short of injuries forcing them up the depth chart, we won't know about both TMJ and Mingo before next year, and that's not acceptable.  Struggling this year to know better about our future is so much better than even making the second weekend in the playoffs thanks to having Hopkins.

And if people can't see that, then they can't see the forest through the trees and can't step back and look at things from the outside through a logical lens.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would focus on CB and Edge. WR room doesn’t look great but you are going to take reps away from young guys like Mingo and Marshall that need them.
 

Hopkins is 31 and has a combined 1200 yards in the last two seasons. More important to invest in our younger guys right now.

Edited by Cdparr7
damn autocorrect
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

I would focus on CB and Edge. WR room doesn’t look great but you are going to take reps away from young guys like Mingo and Marshall that need them.
 

Hopkins is 31 and has a combined 1200 yards in the last two seasons. More important to invest in our younger guys right now.

I'd agree with this to be honest. Wouldn't stop me from being excited though, if Fitt feels it is a good value adding a talented vet WR for Bryce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If we sign Hopkins it tells me 2 things.

 

1. Our young guys aren't really showing much so far.

2. Either Thielen/Chark haven't looked so great. Or they might have concerns for Chark injury history.

I disagree.  Hopkins  IS  a bonafide #1 receiver.   IF you can get one, and it fits your salary cap etc..  you try to get better.  He would ( or should ) make Bryce better . 

I think it's too early to grade  Mingo without live action.  I also think they should know what they have with Shenault and Smith. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What is your personal grade of this draft?
    • No disrespect intended, but you act as if we are supposed to value your opinion when it is all emotion and no fact.  The roster (I assume you mean offense) is "still trash" because someone who just signed up for the Huddle has declared it to be so?   Buhahaha.  ha.  Let me show you how FACTS work, and why emotional, unsupported opinions don't carry much weight: TE: Upgraded through the draft.  Sanders is a weapon that should improve the passing game and give Bryce an outlet he did not have last year. RB:  We just drafted the best RB in college football, one who can protect the passer, run the ball, and catch the ball like nobody else on the roster.  His knee will be cleared July 1.  OL: We just signed two of the best guards in football.  that is what Payton did to protect Brees.  Ekwonu has the skill and talent, he was simply missing technique.  We got him a better OL coach.  Center?  Bozeman was ineffective last year.  Corbett is an established veteran OLman.  It seems we are much better up front. WR:  We added a guy who gets open and has averaged about 900 yards per game as a #2 in Pittsburgh with an inferior QB there.  Thielen was a 1000 yard WR last season.  We have not had a #2 like XL, with his YAC capabilities and ability to catch contested passes.  In other words, the X is much better; the Z will be replaced with a stud WR, and the veteran slot will probably not be the #1 WR in 2024--he should be the #2 or even #3 most effective WR.  The 2023 Z WR, who had 418 yards and was showing signs of improving, will not be a starter in 2024.   As much as the OL has improved, we improved the weapons.  QB:  All of these additions increase levels of protection for the QB that he did not have last year and they give him more powerful weapons that he did not have last year.  Young will not be a rookie getting hammered trying to throw to people who are not separating.  This should make him improved.  How much? remains to be seen. Now keep in mind that we did this by not reworking contracts and kicking the can down the road.  We did not have a first rounder in the draft.  We added a second rounder to next year's draft.  We also addressed needs on defense as well, adding established DL, OLBs, ILBs, and DBs.  We get 2 first round pick starters who were injured most of the season back on that defense.  Yes, we lost Burns, Luvu, and a few others, but while being good players, they were either asking for too much money or they were not great fits for the system.  So the D should be better as well. That is not trash.   
×
×
  • Create New...