Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Previewing "The Blueprint "


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 6/17/2023 at 2:19 PM, Pejorative Miscreant said:

45 second clip of blueprint >entire 3 years of Matt Rhule “process”

I get that it doesn’t guarantee success or wins but it’ is a refreshing change. 

Compare the NFL experience on Rhule’s staff to the current staff, and it’s not hard to get excited even just by the prospect of having some talented NFL minds in the building. I still can’t for the life of me understand what Tepper was thinking by giving Rhule the keys to the franchise. We’re lucky he didn’t f*ck things up more than he did. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Compare the NFL experience on Rhule’s staff to the current staff, and it’s not hard to get excited even just by the prospect of having some talented NFL minds in the building. I still can’t for the life of me understand what Tepper was thinking by giving Rhule the keys to the franchise. We’re lucky he didn’t f*ck things up more than he did. 

Those were some Michelin Star Meatballs. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Compare the NFL experience on Rhule’s staff to the current staff, and it’s not hard to get excited even just by the prospect of having some talented NFL minds in the building. I still can’t for the life of me understand what Tepper was thinking by giving Rhule the keys to the franchise. We’re lucky he didn’t f*ck things up more than he did. 

Over the last ten years (actually longer when you factor in Fox and Rivera were the same style coach), we've gone from a coaching philosophy where the everybody knew what the game plan was going to be, and wins or losses were determined by raw talent, execution, the opponent's ability to develop a game plan to neutralize it, and some breaks (penalties, turnovers) to one where the game plan usually made little sense and did not factor in what our own players did well or poorly (trying to prove they were smarter than everybody else), back to the predictable and dependent on talent, execution, and breaks, to what we hope are game plans and tactics built around our talent with wrinkles thrown in based on what the opponent does well or poorly.  Who knows, maybe it will even have us thinking the staff stole a win or two during the season, something I don't ever remember thinking?

The Fox/Rivera/Wilks style will consistently produce mediocrity with some success and failure sprinkled in to keep fans interested from time to time.  If the team has enough talent, it can produce a championship on some odd year.

The Process style produces frustration among the team and fans, and chuckles from the rest of the league. 

We'll see how the ride in the Reich era goes, but at least it offers hope and coaches that have done it successfully have produced a lot of wins.

In short, there is hope based on the team and not just a small handful of players.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Over the last ten years (actually longer when you factor in Fox and Rivera were the same style coach), we've gone from a coaching philosophy where the everybody knew what the game plan was going to be, and wins or losses were determined by raw talent, execution, the opponent's ability to develop a game plan to neutralize it, and some breaks (penalties, turnovers) to one where the game plan usually made little sense and did not factor in what our own players did well or poorly (trying to prove they were smarter than everybody else), back to the predictable and dependent on talent, execution, and breaks, to what we hope are game plans and tactics built around our talent with wrinkles thrown in based on what the opponent does well or poorly.  Who knows, maybe it will even have us thinking the staff stole a win or two during the season, something I don't ever remember thinking?

The Fox/Rivera/Wilks style will consistently produce mediocrity with some success and failure sprinkled in to keep fans interested from time to time.  If the team has enough talent, it can produce a championship on some odd year.

The Process style produces frustration among the team and fans, and chuckles from the rest of the league. 

We'll see how the ride in the Reich era goes, but at least it offers hope and coaches that have done it successfully have produced a lot of wins.

In short, there is hope based on the team and not just a small handful of players.

Game planning isn't as necessary at the college level because as often as not, you're going to have one team that just has a real edge in talent over the other. By the second half, all you have to do is just keep doing what you're already doing.

I'd say that's a big reason why The Meatball just didn't get it 😖

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Game planning isn't as necessary at the college level because as often as not, you're going to have one team that just has a real edge in talent over the other. By the second half, all you have to do is just keep doing what you're already doing.

I'd say that's a big reason why The Meatball just didn't get it 😖

Good point, although I don't know that The Process was ever leading a program good enough to breathe that air.  Then again, it is not as much how good his programs were against all other competition, just against the ones he faced consistently. 

Regardless, he never showed any competency or interest in doing that here.  The NFL is not generally about motivating players to be their best, it's about devising schemes that put them in a position to be their best.  In my 17 years as a Panther fan, I have not seen our staffs do that.  Hopefully until this season.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I assume you are quoting my still. If so, I don't know what your argument is since mine was simply showing a play where Bryce scored a TD against the Rams in the playoffs where another poster used a similar still of Herbert's line to defend his poor performance last night. Like I said, Herbert is a better QB but Bryce wins the game last night for the Chargers. It simply is something he does better than Herbert and would play to his strengths. Someone even said earlier Chargers only win 1 or 2 games this year if Bryce was their QB which is so absurdly laughable it wasn't even worth trying to address. I mean this thread is literally called "Bryce Young is the worst QB in Panther's History" so I understand there is no objective arguments to be had here but I found that amusing. 
    • I think his knee would make a good reason to switch to guard IF he returns.  Half don't.  Half of those don't last too long.  The strain on a knee (320lb man) vs speed rushers is more substantial.  So I would keep him if I could on a small contract (he will make $17.5 in 2026 fully guaranteed) and think of him as a possible guard for the post Lewis/Hunt era.  Knee injuries in big men are not invitations to invest in them.  
    • I'd give anything to go back to a 4-3 but we are so removed from having the pieces for that. All because Tepper wanted to force this 3-4 on all our coaches. 
×
×
  • Create New...