Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So Ian Thomas…


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Basbear said:

rough crowd...

 

not everyone needs to be the best, ian has a role and its disappointing me ....

Replacing him is very simple and very cheap. You can get dozens of guys every offseason that are capable of reproducing his results that are cheaper.

Sure he passes the look test and his RAS was nasty. But that don't mean poo if you can't do it on Sunday's.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Replacing him is very simple and very cheap. You can get dozens of guys every offseason that are capable of reproducing his results that are cheaper.

Sure he passes the look test and his RAS was nasty. But that don't mean poo if you can't do it on Sunday's.

In fairness, under Rhule, almost nobody did it on Sunday's.  Which is why we lost a bunch of games.  

Thomas may not be great, but I am interested to see if he looks better under the new regime.    

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

In fairness, under Rhule, almost nobody did it on Sunday's.  Which is why we lost a bunch of games.  

Thomas may not be great, but I am interested to see if he looks better under the new regime.    

Unfortunately Thomas appears to be the classic example of a Huddle crush that just keeps proving they aren't interested in us, no matter that they occasionally look our way.

He's ultimately a JAG and almost all JAG's are very replaceable. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Replacing him is very simple and very cheap. You can get dozens of guys every offseason that are capable of reproducing his results that are cheaper.

Sure he passes the look test and his RAS was nasty. But that don't mean poo if you can't do it on Sunday's.

For the record, I hated that contract and said that plenty in that signing thread. But here we are and Iets see this at seasons end...... i hope they know what to do this time..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian Thomas' biggest issue is that for every play that he flashes upside he levels that out with a play that makes you wonder if he'll ever get it.

At this stage in his career, teams aren't going to be looking at potential. They're going to look at the lack of consistency. Hopefully he's able to flip the switch this season, both for the team and for himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

For the record, I hated that contract and said that plenty in that signing thread. But here we are and Iets see this at seasons end...... i hope they know what to do this time..

Yeah that was one of the most confounding roster moves we have made in recent memory.

I sincerely hope that was mostly Rhule.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2023 at 9:38 AM, OUCPFL said:

Might've been looking at something different. You go back to the Broncos and Seattle games on the screen passes he lowers his head to try to get more yards. 

Tries and succeeds are two totally different things. He can try all he wants, but he consistently gets knocked back by 180lb CB's. Unacceptable at this level. 

Edited by 33inNC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 33inNC said:

Tries and succeeds are two totally different things. He can try all he wants, but he consistently gets knocked back by 180lb CB's. Unacceptable at this level. 

Yeah. You must've been watching something different. I watched those Panthers highlights at least 7 times now and that did not happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2023 at 4:28 PM, kungfoodude said:

Replacing him is very simple and very cheap. You can get dozens of guys every offseason that are capable of reproducing his results that are cheaper.

Sure he passes the look test and his RAS was nasty. But that don't mean poo if you can't do it on Sunday's.

Funny note -- Hurst & Ian came out of the same draft class.  One we treat as this established vet that we brought in and another we're somehow still thinking may bloom any day now.

This will be Ian's 6th year and is on his second contract.  He's honestly lucky to be here at this point.

I'd personally prefer to see what strides Tremble makes.  He's super young (the age of a lot of rookies this year).  Critical year developmentally for him.  TEs are known to take time (2-3 years), but not 6...

Probably the last year here for Thomas unless he somehow has some completely out of nowhere breakout.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bear Hands said:

Funny note -- Hurst & Ian came out of the same draft class.  One we treat as this established vet that we brought in and another we're somehow still thinking may bloom any day now.

This will be Ian's 6th year and is on his second contract.  He's honestly lucky to be here at this point.

I'd personally prefer to see what strides Tremble makes.  He's super young (the age of a lot of rookies this year).  Critical year developmentally for him.  TEs are known to take time (2-3 years), but not 6...

Probably the last year here for Thomas unless he somehow has some completely out of nowhere breakout.

Based on his play and production, Ian Thomas should be a guy bouncing around the league trying to make a roster as a 3rd TE with his team constantly on the look out for a better option. Meanwhile, the Panthers pay him like he's a mid-level starter.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Based on his play and production, Ian Thomas should be a guy bouncing around the league trying to make a roster as a 3rd TE with his team constantly on the look out for a better option. Meanwhile, the Panthers pay him like he's a mid-level starter.

It's pretty annoying we kept him around from a fan's perspective--stemming not only from the lack of production, but his off the field issue and that 2022 contract as well (now restructured, but still..) 

Sure, he became a better blocker and has always sounded like a good practice dude per reports, but his raw athleticism never translated to Sundays.  You have to show something, at some point. 

Who knows ha, I have no expectations for him.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

It's pretty annoying we kept him around from a fan's perspective--stemming not only from the lack of production, but his off the field issue and that 2022 contract as well (now restructured, but still..) 

Sure, he became a better blocker and has always sounded like a good practice dude per reports, but his raw athleticism never translated to Sundays.  You have to show something, at some point. 

Who knows ha, I have no expectations for him.     

Imagine being a guy who has bounced around the league occasionally sticking to rosters as a #3 TE always making league minimum and being like Ian Thomas has made HOW MUCH??? WTF??!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...