Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Simms on Bryce Young


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I don't think he is talking about his capacity it's more visually or aesthetics.  He wants his first overall pick to be bigger and stronger and have a rocket arm.  

It was just a surprising take given most analysts ignore fans saying they don't really know football. Now suddenly Joe muscles is an expert. He would have been better off saying nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Corral has played the equivalent of 1 preseason at this point. Half of that with McAdoo and Rhule. 
 

Yeah “literally everyone on this board has seen enough.”

 

 

lol he's trash. i'm not sure why this is even a discussion point. typical one read and panic quarterback who got by on athleticism in college and sucks in the nfl.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

And with Richardson you are HEAVILY relying on him developing into a good QB not just a good athlete.

Yeah Young/Stroud were the safer picks. With decent coaching that both have solid floors as a capable starting QB. AR was the gamble with the highest ceiling but could just as easily bust. I would have been happy with Young/Stroud and very curious with AR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of physical specimens QBs  taken in with the first 3 picks of the draft who are either out of the league, underachieving or backups

i don’t know how Bryce will do 

mi know he is smart enough to do his best to stay out of harms way and smart enough to know where his players are …

as for me, well, hope, for the very best  

I seemed to recall Simms thought Corral was a first rounder, truth in disclosure, of that qb draft class, I did too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, ncfan said:

That’s hilarious. I see how that could happen though especially if a QB is learning a new system. 
 

My son is 9 and playing QB on his rec team. He’s had a few of those moments in practices. Haha

”Flip Double Blue Right, Fake X Jet, Ruby 20 Zone” is a mouthful for a kid that age. 

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

we should be concerned because some drunk musclebound jocks and/or his wife has just noticed that young is smaller than the usual QB. 

Keep Up Where Were You GIF by Britannia

i.e. causal fans who don't live and breath the NFL and certainly won't have watched the Draft.

They're fair observations - if he's going to succeed he'll have to break the mould.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...