Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Cuts

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, App Panther said:

If Foreman is truly cut (doubt it) need to be the first person we call. 

Agreed.  But, I don't think it's coincidental he only really blew up like he did with us and can't stick anywhere else...  he clearly is talented, but he excels in a specific type of system - like the one we ran once Wilks took over last season.

And tbh, I don't know that any of us really know what kind of system we're planning to run here this year under Reich/Brown, considering they were also experimenting with it dueing the preseason.  Gonna be interesting...  but I loved me some Foreman.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Agreed.  But, I don't think it's coincidental he only really blew up like he did with us and can't stick anywhere else...  he clearly is talented, but he excels in a specific type of system - like the one we ran once Wilks took over last season.

And tbh, I don't know that any of us really know what kind of system we're planning to run here this year under Reich/Brown, considering they were also experimenting with it dueing the preseason.  Gonna be interesting...  but I loved me some Foreman.

I'd take him over any of our backups in any system.  If he is on waivers then no, but if we can just sign him then why not

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Z knight should be looked at

When I was looking at RB depth, he was one of the names that jumped out.  Not gonna lie, if Sanders gets bitten by the injury bug, we could be in for a long year.  It's a catch 22, while the RB market has dried up in value, try operating an offense without a true RB1 unless you have a Mahommes, Burrow or Allen all-star QB1 in place.  Bryce isn't there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Why would they cut Foreman? Thats crazy. If they cut him, we should be calling him right after.

I was surprised when I heard this as well. Guys on WFNZ were talking about it the other day. I don't recall anyone giving a good reason.

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...