Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots claim Matt Corral


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, onmyown said:

The idiots he hired wasted resources. He is a hands on owner and wants the credit and doesn’t understand he’s incapable. Everything comes back to him as such. Are you dumb?

You’re a the owner can do no wrong poster and just insult other posters when they call out their BS. 

Why don’t you ignore people who disagree with you in that the FO is always making the best decisions and never to blame? This question doesn’t need and answer.

You sir, are a joke.  I wish you would at be accurate when you attempt to describe me. 

There is no point even arguing with you. You fail to grasp simple concepts. 

Enjoy talking more trust about me.  Like I care what anybody thinks of me.  The day I care about that, is a day I'm no longer a man. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

Not a big fan of carrying 3 QBs on the roster but you could certainly do much worse for a 3rd QB if you are going to keep 3. Zappe doesn't really have any upside or unrealized potential, he pretty much is what he is

Given the choice, would you sign Zappe or Grier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

True but he’s also brilliant and smarter than everyone else. This really makes the Panthers look like fools 

I remember when Belichik snaked Tyler Gaffney that one time and people around here were saying some of this same stuff. Turns out it wasn’t some genius move after all. I also don’t think Belichik is what he once was and been drinking too much of his own koolaid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

We need a 3rd QB.  We are all concerned about Bryce getting injured. Andy has recently  had back issues.  In any game we could get to QB #3 before halftime.  Zappe did ok in live action.  Getting him would be funny too.  But we do  need someone who can come in and play.

Belichick has been making some strange decisions  the last couple of years.

Same question I asked t96 above...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WUnderhill said:

I remember when Belichik snaked Tyler Gaffney that one time and people around here were saying some of this same stuff. Turns out it wasn’t some genius move after all. I also don’t think Belichik is what he once was and been drinking too much of his own koolaid.

There was a massive chorus of praise and Super Bowl predictions when Belichick grabbed Cam Newton too.

(hell, he had McDaniels running the offense then)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

BB hasn't done jack poo because HC get too much credit. He had the GOAT QB on his side. The moment Brady left the Patriots championship window closed.

 

It's like Pop was winning championships when Tim Duncan was around. The moment he retired the Spurs have never been close to a contender even with one of the best coaches of alltime.

 

Sports is a players league always has always will. 

I mean obviously losing an all time GOAT hurts. I don't disagree BB is overrated. But as far as the NFL goes it's a QB league. Until you find that guy you are just stuck in the mud doesn't matter who is coaching. IDGAF if the Patriots suck for the next several decades it's fine with me. I just want my Panthers to get their act together and stop being the butt of jokes.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wundrbread33 said:

And if that doesn’t happen, that trade still looks hilarious that we basically gave the Pats two 3rds and a 4th for funzies. 

Wut? Am I missing something?

With claiming Matt Corral, the Patriots essentially gained 2 picks, our 3rd and our 4th for free. We didn't lose 3 picks in that trade, no matter which way you slice it. That's some head scratching math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Wut? Am I missing something?

With claiming Matt Corral, the Patriots essentially gained 2 picks, our 3rd and our 4th for free. We didn't lose 3 picks in that trade, no matter which way you slice it. That's some head scratching math.

But....they got Matt Corral as their backup QB.  is that a win?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Wut? Am I missing something?

With claiming Matt Corral, the Patriots essentially gained 2 picks, our 3rd and our 4th for free. We didn't lose 3 picks in that trade, no matter which way you slice it. That's some head scratching math.

I meant it like “now they have 3 of our things.”

But yes they originally had the pick. So yes. They originally got 2 of our things, and we got one of their things, and we drafted a player with that thing, but now they have the player we picked, and they still have the others 2 things of ours.

 

Math hurts. You’re right. I concede. fug the Pats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...