Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Murph said:

South Carolina is a very good team talent wise. They just didn’t show it Saturday and we’re completely unprepared for UNC’s aggressive scheme on D. They started slow last year and turned into giant killers. I fully expect them to win 8-9 games this year. 

SC lost a lot of talent off of what was really Dr Jeckyl and Mr Hyde team last year.  Hard to really gauge them. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Dominating the LOS

UNC OL : 0 sacks allowed

UNC DL: -2 yards rushing allowed

UNC: 8 sacks 

I know Carolina played a terrible team but man if they can keep this up…look out 

I think though temper it for now. Their QB was what 114qb rating, 30/36 or something like that. Sounds like the secondary is shaky.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I think though temper it for now. Their QB was what 114qb rating, 30/36 or something like that. Sounds like the secondary is shaky.  

Secondary took a big hit with DeAndre Boykins OFY. Dude was poised to have a big season. I still think they’ll be better than the past couple of seasons by losing some bonehead me first players. 
 

also - Rattler is a solid QB. Not sure UNC will face another QB at his level aside from Clemson. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

Y’all know nobody wants any part of Alabama, Georgia, or the majority of the SEC. Good start for the ACC, but consistency is the key. 

The SEC is top heavy, like always.

Alabama and Georgia lead the way, there's a couple of good teams (probably Tennessee) and then a whole host of teams that trade off the SEC brand. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The SEC is top heavy, like always.

Alabama and Georgia lead the way, there's a couple of good teams (probably Tennessee) and then a whole host of teams that trade off the SEC brand. 

Yep. This is always the reality. 2-3 elite teams, 2-3 good teams, and then the rest of the filler who chant "SEC! SEC! SEC!" to ride the coattails of the aforementioned relevant teams.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. This is always the reality. 2-3 elite teams, 2-3 good teams, and then the rest of the filler who chant "SEC! SEC! SEC!" to ride the coattails of the aforementioned relevant teams.

 

Was typing just about the same response. If FSU was an SEC school, they’d jump up to #3 in the rankings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

Was typing just about the same response. If FSU was an SEC school, they’d jump up to #3 in the rankings.

If FSU was a SEC school they would have started the season higher than 8.  Clemson would be higher than 9 too.  All SEC schools get favoritism in the early polls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...