Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Falcons GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Serious request: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs18jn-zj0Q

I'd love to know, aside from one deep ball, where all the amazing plays were supposed to originate today with no open receivers. Looked like the absolute most touchdowns he could've thrown today was 2.

I’m going to do my normal all-22 breakdown this week. I’ll post by Thursday 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I’m seeing 2 sacks and those cane at the end whenever they would blitz knowing he had to pass one was an overloaded blitz. 

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Yeah it really wasn’t that bad. We hung around and eventually the 3 turnovers (4 if you count failed 4th down conversion) with 17 points coming from them was too much to overcome. Our defense played much better than expected just ran out of gas at the end.

Basically our rookie QB made a couple rookie mistakes and if he cleans that up (which we all know he can) we will be fine.  I mean our staff addressed the media saying we may start off rough, but will look much better by season’s end. Now we have people writing off Young. Well ok if we are using game 1 as a sample size, AR is injury prone, and Stroud can’t score at this level. I guess they all are busts?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah it really wasn’t that bad. We hung around and eventually the 3 turnovers (4 if you count failed 4th down conversion) with 17 points coming from them was too much to overcome. Our defense played much better than expected just ran out of gas at the end.

Basically our rookie QB made a couple rookie mistakes and if he cleans that up (which we all know he can) we will be fine.  I mean our staff addressed the media saying we may start off rough, but will look much better by season’s end. Now we have people writing off Young. Well ok if we are using game 1 as a sample size, AR is injury prone, and Stroud can’t score at this level. I guess they all are busts?

Don’t forget fields can’t throw the ball, pickett is a bust and burrow is regressing after he got paid.

 

surprised no one is talking about that rams/burns trade as frequently as they were.🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Bears fans have a legitimate right to bitch. Year three of Fields and it looks like the same ol Bears. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I’m seeing 2 sacks and those cane at the end whenever they would blitz knowing he had to pass one was an overloaded blitz. 

The commentators at least twice during said that Atlanta had 3 sacks at that specific point, but they didn't have any, Carolina was the team with 3 sacks. They then did a half-assed correction saying "Atlanta doesn't have 3 sacks, but they do have 2 interceptions." (Classic NFL commentating not giving the Panther's even a crumb.)

Add the two real ones they got towards the end and that may be the source of the "5 sacks" number.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, travisura said:

The commentators at least twice during said that Atlanta had 3 sacks at that specific point, but they didn't have any, Carolina was the team with 3 sacks. They then did a half-assed correction saying "Atlanta doesn't have 3 sacks, but they do have 2 interceptions." (Classic NFL commentating not giving the Panther's even a crumb.)

Add the two real ones they got towards the end and that may be the source of the "5 sacks" number.

Makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Fitts is serious about continuously looking to upgrade this roster, he needs to, right now, sign a short yardage RB and compliment to Hurst.  We have the roster spots.  Wooten was elevated for game day, so we essentially have two available roster spots.

I get the WR aspect, and actually that is priority #1, but there is nothing out there really worth signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, travisura said:

The commentators at least twice during said that Atlanta had 3 sacks at that specific point, but they didn't have any, Carolina was the team with 3 sacks. They then did a half-assed correction saying "Atlanta doesn't have 3 sacks, but they do have 2 interceptions." (Classic NFL commentating not giving the Panther's even a crumb.)

Add the two real ones they got towards the end and that may be the source of the "5 sacks" number.

This. Fugging announcers… should know better than to listen to them. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Gotta disagree here. Not a single thread was created on either of their boards to bench Fields or Jones. They blamed the front office and the OL. 

here, if a WR is covered and the QB throws it away before getting hit, he’s not NFL ready and needs to benched all season

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

we are not even good at over reacting 

There are people pining for the leadership of Marty Hurney right now.

We may have officially reached The Ninth Circle of Dumb 🙄

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...