Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what is up with Andy Dalton coming in for QB sneaks?


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was listening to Saints radio and Deuce McAllister. It is the only way to listen to the Panthers in my area.
 

Deuce claimed “the Panthers were getting cute”.  He claimed that the change in the quarterback caused the false start which cost the Panthers 5 yards.  An offense gets used to one quarterback, and then when they stick, a new quarterback in,  the offensive line is not used to the new quarterback.

I think the Panthers were going to pick up the first down. They may have put Andy Dalton in to give him credit for getting the 1st down,  against his former team. (They had 4th and inches.  (Practically a give me first down.)

However, it backfired.  In my opinion, this was the turning point in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Irony yes you could say that as long as there is no intent to claim that because he left we all of a sudden got so bad we are losing all the time. Which it seems like you might be trying to imply.  Did we lose something? Yes we did. Was it worth 5 years at 28 mil per? Not to my thinking.   
    • https://www.facebook.com/MEMES.of.the.NFL/videos/779983564773360/ LOL 
    • First: What do you think the word ‘scapegoating’ means? Because what I said was not scapegoating.  They are two different players playing two different roles.  I simply said two things about Burns, if I recall. One, basically he is a one dimensional player that is doing well because they have a very strong front in NY.  Two, I was against paying his price because he is a liability against the run. One dimensional and therefore not worth it.  Summing it up: he e is a pass rush specialist, about all I have ever felt about him, and his financial demands made him much less of a value.  IMO. 
×
×
  • Create New...