Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Bailey says Tepper isnt happy, wants changes now.


CPF4LIFE
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

He's quickly developing the Panthers into an organization that people with any other options available are going to want to avoid.

If only Dundon had the funds to buy the panthers. He literally came in house day one. Cleaned it out promoted our coach and left all the hockey direct decisions to the GM and Coach. He’s very active in managing the business, as a business… but not the team. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

He can fire Fitt.  That really the only place to go when it comes time to feed the angry football god.  Which does nothing to make us better today. 

Can't even blame the OC when it's Frank call the plays out of his core O.  But Frank has done it before. 

Firing fitt and promoting Dan would cool off some folks for sure

 

Mr scott said dan wouldnt take the job because he is friends with fat fitt

 

speaking of which where is mr scott?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tbe said:

It might be time for fans to start booing Tepper and making signs about meddling owners.

Tepper’s lack of patience is why the team is in this mess. 

He needs to…

STOP trading the future for stupid ‘win now’ bets.

STOP making demands and let this org stabilize. Consistency and stability in staff and the front office is required for a winning team.

STOP thinking this team can win now. The Panthers are 3-4 years of decent drafts away from winning at a minimum.

Somebody needs to step up and go to a game donning a full on clown suit and wig while wearing a custom made David Tepper face mask. He's gonna ban you from BOA 100% but it'll be worth it. 😂

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Can't fire a first year coach mid season, so what's he going to do?

Reich won't give up play calling.

He is the check writer 

he wrote a lot of checks 

he can do whatever he wants whenever he wants 

if Reich does not give up play calling, he will be fired and that might not be a bad thing 

 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He really cannot fire Reich 6 games in, I mean that would be some fuged up poo

I honestly wouldn't care. Frank was a iffy hire from the start and with him being a OC and QB guru they should have got the guy he felt the most comfortable with. I said this back on draft time, we needed a QB and you dont listen to the guy you specifically brought in to help fix that position allegedly? Makes no sense, disaster waiting to happen. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Firing fitt and promoting Dan would cool off some folks for sure

 

Mr scott said dan wouldnt take the job because he is friends with fat fitt

 

speaking of which where is mr scott?

It would basically appease people over the bye week.  "They did something".  But it changes nothing in the short term.  All it takes is a week of football and everyone would be just as enraged with a L to Houston. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...