Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns is beating double teams


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

Peppers was 10x times better than Burns.. and we let him go!! Peppers wanted to stay but they refused to pay him!! seems obvious panthers holding on him for trade bait at this point!! I like Burns I think it would be a mistake to let him go!!! We need to keep him and make zero trades!! Ride this year out!! Try schemes give Thomas OC duties and rebuild next few years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, RJK said:

Paying burns top 5 pass rusher $ is a mistake and will hurt the franchise in the long run. So that’s exactly what fitt will do 

It would be expensive, but it would be for a top 5-10 edge for 3-5 years of his prime on the next deal.

 

Wouldn’t it also hurt the franchise in the “long run” to not have that edge?

 

Both sides of the argument have their merits. 
 

However…if Bryce is worth a damn, then Burns contract is inconsequential since we won’t have an expensive QB deal to care about. 
 

That’s why I think people are caring a bit too much about his potential annual salary. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DamnItJake! said:

Peppers was 10x times better than Burns.. and we let him go!! Peppers wanted to stay but they refused to pay him!! seems obvious panthers holding on him for trade bait at this point!! I like Burns I think it would be a mistake to let him go!!! We need to keep him and make zero trades!! Ride this year out!! Try schemes give Thomas OC duties and rebuild next few years 

Could have sworn Peppers wanted to leave. He lived in NC his whole life and wanted to experience a different place. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Icege said:

20231006_181339.thumb.jpg.1aed3208fcae636f50336bfdf584f576.jpg

"bUt hE dIssAppEArs In crUcIAl mOmEnts"

Burns is leading the team in sacks, forced fumbles, TFLs, QB hits, and pressures all while facing more double teams.

What's he supposed to do? Play offense too? Pay the man before folks are crying about him balling out somewhere else!

The same crowd that wants to ship off Burns for a receiver and pick is the generally the same crowd that had DJ Moore slated as a number two receiver.

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Could have sworn Peppers wanted to leave. He lived in NC his whole life and wanted to experience a different place. 

I do remember that he was wanting out of NC too..But I also read he was willing to stay for the right price.. I get it I joined the military to get out of NC to see the world!! It worked out him he got on hood teams.. had to correct this cuz I thought he did get a ring… I was wrong.. still a good dude!!

Edited by DamnItJake!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

It would be expensive, but it would be for a top 5-10 edge for 3-5 years of his prime on the next deal.

 

Wouldn’t it also hurt the franchise in the “long run” to not have that edge?

 

Both sides of the argument have their merits. 
 

However…if Bryce is worth a damn, then Burns contract is inconsequential since we won’t have an expensive QB deal to care about. 
 

That’s why I think people are caring a bit too much about his potential annual salary. 

Burns isn’t an every down player. You can’t pay a situational pass rusher that kind of money when there are holes at pretty much every position on offense. Not to mention I’d hate to see how invisible Spiderman becomes when he gets paid and starts to coast 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Could have sworn Peppers wanted to leave. He lived in NC his whole life and wanted to experience a different place. 

Yea he wanted to leave,  he had to leave mentally for his sake. 

He publicly announced he wanted to play somewhere else. 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frankw said:

I've been pro-Burns but you can't deny his disappearances. It's looking like we should have figured out a way to keep DJ and trade him. Moore and Brown should have been the only two off limits if we were making a move for a franchise QB.

If you looked at DJ he “disappeared” sometimes as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RJK said:

Burns isn’t an every down player. You can’t pay a situational pass rusher that kind of money when there are holes at pretty much every position on offense. Not to mention I’d hate to see how invisible Spiderman becomes when he gets paid and starts to coast 

I respectfully disagree with everything you said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I think we're going to hang on to Brian and place the franchise tag on him, possibly trade him in the offseason, not in-season 

I very much could see this being what happens if the team's record is as abysmal as fans are fearing. Would be the smartest move also, imo.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...