Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

First 4 game comparisons


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm just posting this for comparison and for discussion, nothing else: 

Bryce: 63.9%, 750 Yards, 5 TD, 4 INT

CJ: 60.2%, 1219, 7/0

AR: 59.5%, 577, 3/1

Kenny: 69%, 771, 2/7

T Law: 58.2%, 873, 5/7

Zach: 56.8% , 925, 4/8

Fields: 50.2%, 448, 1/2

Mac: 71%, 1012, 4/4

Herbert: 69.2%, 1195, 9/3

Tua: 60.2%, 593, 6/0

Joe: 66%, 1121, 6/2

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost all of those need context. Just looking at numbers Bryces look decent for a rookie. But how many of those tds came late in games when the opposing defense was playing looser to prevent big plays, and how many of those ints came at crucial moments in the game that let the other team run away with them momentum and the game? And it doesn't include his fumbles either 

And ton of his passes are completed near or at the Los. Something more useful would be a breakdown of completion percentages from specific throwing yards ranges

Just glancing at those numbers you might give him a B or something as a quarter season report, but using the eye test he's played like a C or D in critical moments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

Almost all of those need context. Just looking at numbers Bryces look decent for a rookie. But how many of those tds came late in games when the opposing defense was playing looser to prevent big plays, and how many of those ints came at crucial moments in the game that let the other team run away with them momentum and the game? And it doesn't include his fumbles either 

And ton of his passes are completed near or at the Los. Something more useful would be a breakdown of completion percentages from specific throwing yards ranges

Just glancing at those numbers you might give him a B or something as a quarter season report, but using the eye test he's played like a C or D in critical moments.

Exactly! 

ALL of his numbers here are basically coming in trash time when the game is very much out of hand.

But CJ on the other hand... wow... what a whiff on our part. If the NFL allowed one mulligan per team, now would be the time to use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

Almost all of those need context. Just looking at numbers Bryces look decent for a rookie. But how many of those tds came late in games when the opposing defense was playing looser to prevent big plays, and how many of those ints came at crucial moments in the game that let the other team run away with them momentum and the game? And it doesn't include his fumbles either 

And ton of his passes are completed near or at the Los. Something more useful would be a breakdown of completion percentages from specific throwing yards ranges

Just glancing at those numbers you might give him a B or something as a quarter season report, but using the eye test he's played like a C or D in critical moments.

Context for Fields was he received 0 first team reps in camp or preseason. They were planning on bringing him along slowly and then they they started so terribly so threw him out there after Dalton got banged up. 
 

He was never supposed to be the starter year 1. All the other guys on the list got their teams first team reps as far as I can recall. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had 101 yards and 2 TDs in the 4th quarter yesterday after the Lions went into a shell prevent defense.

He also had a garbage time TD and yardage in the Saints game as well.

Stats never tell the full picture and Bryce's completion percentages (thanks to all the screens) and his yardage/TDs are not indicative of his actual play, but game situation.

He's been AWFUL in the first 3 quarters of games so far, just beyond bad.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the funniest things to me is after all the exhausting talk about how small and injury prone Bryce is, that it would be a MIRACLE if he made it through the season, is that 6’5 240 AR is the injury prone guy.

Bryce has taken some crazy shots and been rag dolled around the field and he always just jumps up real quick. He has some real toughness and I’ve always liked that in a player.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

He had 101 yards and 2 TDs in the 4th quarter yesterday after the Lions went into a shell prevent defense.

He also had a garbage time TD and yardage in the Saints game as well.

Stats never tell the full picture and Bryce's completion percentages (thanks to all the screens) and his yardage/TDs are not indicative of his actual play, but game situation.

He's been AWFUL in the first 3 quarters of games so far, just beyond bad.

You don’t know what awful looks like lmao. Bryce has looked up and down. Awful is not being able to sustain drives, hit your receivers when they’re open, convert third downs. Bryce is doing those things.

Awful is the Jimmy Clausen 2010 offense. If you wanna get some perspective on that, Bryce threw as many touchdowns yesterday as Jimmy did in the entire season.

You can say the lions were in a shell prevent the 4th quarter but they weren’t. You think they were in prevent on the goal line?? They weren’t blitzing but they weren’t in prevent, they were in cover 2/cover 3 most of the second half.

 Anyways, your quarterback analysis is what’s truly awful here. Bryce has been up and down, some bad and some good. He’s a rookie. Get over it.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, thebdawg said:

You don’t know what awful looks like lmao. Bryce has looked up and down. Awful is not being able to sustain drives, hit your receivers when they’re open, convert third downs. Bryce is doing those things.

Awful is the Jimmy Clausen 2010 offense. If you wanna get some perspective on that, Bryce threw as many touchdowns yesterday as Jimmy did in the entire season.

You can say the lions were in a shell prevent the 4th quarter but they weren’t. You think they were in prevent on the goal line?? They weren’t blitzing but they weren’t in prevent, they were in cover 2/cover 3 most of the second half.

 Anyways, your quarterback analysis is what’s truly awful here. Bryce has been up and down, some bad and some good. He’s a rookie. Get over it.

Ostrich Avestruz GIF by Amnistía Internacional España

denial GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...