Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Bryce Young needs superstars to be successful"


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Yesterday wasn’t on the WR, even on the completed passes Bryce was getting hit. He had no time to go trough his progressions, on that Chark deep pass he couldn’t step into the throw cause there was a guy right there

100%.  He had to release it early

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One or the other has to give. I think this receiving core is average to below average. If the offensive line was middle of the pack, then it's doable

However, you can't have both a below average receiving room and below average offensive line.

Honestly, if they acquire a WR on the caliber of Tyler Lockett as no.1, keep Thielen in the slot, and Christensen and Corbett return to full strength will pay dividends for the offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Most need them.  A prime Cam, Lamar, Vick type can win without them.   The more untraditional types. 

and then the elite GOAT types QBs can win without them.  Like a prime Tom Brady, Rodgers could likely win games without superstars.  But in the NFL, most need them. 

and that's just winning games.  Not competing to do something special. 

The argument a rookie Bryce Young of all people didn't or doesn't need them is a comical farce IMO.  Which was pointed out by many leading into this season when people where pimping this Panther PR about how it was going to work to our advantage somehow lol. 

QBs that can make plays strictly with their legs can make due with subpar talent around them, but that is very temporary.  Cam short career, Vick couldn't stay healthy, Lamar has had an injury bug lately so they are trying to surround him with better talent which is the right thing to do.

Brady and Rogers typically had elite OLs and when they didn't they struggled (relatively speaking).  Rodgers started getting banged up with his OL got injured and of course this year without an elite group of blockers.  Rodgers also had Adams for a while and Brady had Gronk (later part of his career), Brady's Tampa team was pretty loaded and Rodgers was trying to do the same with that Jets team.  They realize they need the talent around them to really make a run.  Mahomes could be another one outside of Kelce he hasn't been working with much since Hill left.  Maybe we just need an elite TE for Young?  Gronk for Brady, Andrews for Lamar, Olsen for Cam, Kelce for Mahomes, Kittle for Purdy seem to go a long way. 

I agree with your last paragraph 100%.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway you look at it Bryce needs excellence everywhere around him to play average. Yes he can be carried in that situation but it's also such an exhausting expectation, especially given the current abilities of the staff to find, keep and cultivate talent.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

QBs that can make plays strictly with their legs can make due with subpar talent around them, but that is very temporary.  Cam short career, Vick couldn't stay healthy, Lamar has had an injury bug lately so they are trying to surround him with better talent which is the right thing to do.

Brady and Rogers typically had elite OLs and when they didn't they struggled (relatively speaking).  Rodgers started getting banged up with his OL got injured and of course this year without an elite group of blockers.  Rodgers also had Adams for a while and Brady had Gronk (later part of his career), Brady's Tampa team was pretty loaded and Rodgers was trying to do the same with that Jets team.  They realize they need the talent around them to really make a run.  Mahomes could be another one outside of Kelce he hasn't been working with much since Hill left.  Maybe we just need an elite TE for Young?  Gronk for Brady, Andrews for Lamar, Olsen for Cam, Kelce for Mahomes, Kittle for Purdy seem to go a long way. 

I agree with your last paragraph 100%.  

never was implying it was a good plan but you can give certain select few weak talent and not suck.  That's not and never has been Bryce Young. 

and that's also why Bryce Young isn't the problem. The Panthers are.  Tepper was literally bragging about taking Bryce Young to save money and not have superstars on O.   Bryce Young isn't and doesn't project to be one of those anomalies. He doesn't know football.  He doesn't even have idiot message board level football IQ IMO. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

never was implying it was a good plan but you can give certain select few weak talent and not suck.  That's not and never has been Bryce Young. 

and that's also why Bryce Young isn't the problem. The Panthers are.  Tepper was literally bragging about taking Bryce Young to save money and not have superstars on O.   Bryce Young isn't and doesn't project to be one of those anomalies. He doesn't know football.  He doesn't even have idiot message board level football IQ IMO. 

I agree.  They keep trying to do a quick fix and unfortunately there isn't one.  Trading away picks and turning down great offers for players when our roster is no one near ready has shown to be very short sighted.  The latest is throwing a rookie QB out there and seeing if he can save this offense that's stripped away of most of it's talent.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer:  Bryce is our guy for at least this year and next.  At that point, if he's still the same guy he is today, he'll become our backup QB as we draft our new guy for our new coach.  That said . . . 

To me, this is a terrible argument.  "He needs more around him".    If a guy is good enough to trade away your future, he better be the guy that elevates the team around him.

For the folks who say "He needs time to throw" . . . well here are 11 guys who have been sacked more often, generally hurried more often, blitzed more often and had more balls dropped.

image.thumb.png.2dc41404d39c8a7de31ce4ce9368bc62.png

Here's another way to look at something similar, look at all these guys with LESS pocket time that Bryce.  Now, to be clear, the definition of pocket time here is one I really like.  It's time in the pocket before pressure OR before throwing the ball.  It puts equal weight on the QB making quick decisions and the line protecting.

image.thumb.png.1c0e8aafd4cde45b4fba00f4afd0d8b1.png

To all the folks who say "He needs an offense designed around his arm", I'm blacking out all the guys with less than 30 attempts, but using the same sort order as above.  Now we're looking at downfield throw numbers.  Bear in mind these are ATTEMPTS, not completions.

image.thumb.png.6915843899eacf110d8021431f01d549.png

No one in the league has fewer downfield attempts than Bryce.  It's not because he has so much less time.  It's an impossibility that our staff don't know this.  They know it.  They understand what it is doing to our offense.  Look no further than Andy Dalton.  The Red Rifle has nearly as many 20+ throws (7) in ONE GAME as Bryce has all season (8) . . . IN OUR OFFENSE.

The bottom line is that Bryce is not NFL ready right now.  He needs to sit.  He needs to watch Dalton operate the offense.  To understand how quickly decisions need to be made.  BY still has plenty of time to prove that he can be the guy before heads roll.  But the other 50+ guys on that roster deserve a chance to compete.

 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Disclaimer:  Bryce is our guy for at least this year and next.  At that point, if he's still the same guy he is today, he'll become our backup QB as we draft our new guy for our new coach.  That said . . . 

To me, this is a terrible argument.  "He needs more around him".    If a guy is good enough to trade away your future, he better be the guy that elevates the team around him.

For the folks who say "He needs time to throw" . . . well here are 11 guys who have been sacked more often, generally hurried more often, blitzed more often and had more balls dropped.

image.thumb.png.2dc41404d39c8a7de31ce4ce9368bc62.png

Here's another way to look at something similar, look at all these guys with LESS pocket time that Bryce.  Now, to be clear, the definition of pocket time here is one I really like.  It's time in the pocket before pressure OR before throwing the ball.  It puts equal weight on the QB making quick decisions and the line protecting.

image.thumb.png.1c0e8aafd4cde45b4fba00f4afd0d8b1.png

To all the folks who say "He needs an offense designed around his arm", I'm blacking out all the guys with less than 30 attempts, but using the same sort order as above.  Now we're looking at downfield throw numbers.  Bear in mind these are ATTEMPTS, not completions.

image.thumb.png.6915843899eacf110d8021431f01d549.png

No one in the league has fewer downfield attempts than Bryce.  It's not because he has so much less time.  It's an impossibility that our staff don't know this.  They know it.  They understand what it is doing to our offense.  Look no further than Andy Dalton.  The Red Rifle has nearly as many 20+ throws (7) in ONE GAME as Bryce has all season (8) . . . IN OUR OFFENSE.

The bottom line is that Bryce is not NFL ready right now.  He needs to sit.  He needs to watch Dalton operate the offense.  To understand how quickly decisions need to be made.  BY still has plenty of time to prove that he can be the guy before heads roll.  But the other 50+ guys on that roster deserve a chance to compete.

 

Great breakdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrianS said:

For the folks who say "He needs time to throw" . . . well here are 11 guys who have been sacked more often, generally hurried more often, blitzed more often and had more balls dropped

So you're blaming Bryce for throwing the ball away instead of taking a sack.

yes he needs more time to throw because his receivers have below average separation and need more time to get open. 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before we just needed an average QB. Now that CMC and Moore are gone, now we just need average weapons. 

 

All the while we just wanted average coaching. 
 

From where I’m sitting, I don’t think any of it is average. 

 

Beating a dead horse…but Tepper really didn’t settle for mediocrity after all. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, NAS said:

So you're blaming Bryce for throwing the ball away instead of taking a sack.

yes he needs more time to throw because his receivers have below average separation and need more time to get open. 

Our receivers are SLIGHTLY below average by NFL standards.  Not massively, not even considerably.  Just slightly.  The NFL averages about 3 yards of separation.  Our top 5 receivers average 2.74 yards.  Is the difference between success and failure:  9 inches of separation?  That's the hill we want to take a stand on?

Think of it this way.  What if our WR corps was George Pickens, Cooper Kupp, DJ Moore, Kyle Pitts and Stefon Diggs.  Would Bryce be out of excuses then?  I daresay he would be.  He would also be throwing to receivers with 2.34 yards of average separation.  Far less than we have now.

Bryce needs to sit and learn.  He's not one of the ones who comes in and lights it up.  We have ample evidence of this fact now.  That may be ok long term.  But there are a lot of guys in the locker room who want to win, and Bryce can't get us there right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BrianS said:

Disclaimer:  Bryce is our guy for at least this year and next.  At that point, if he's still the same guy he is today, he'll become our backup QB as we draft our new guy for our new coach.  That said . . . 

To me, this is a terrible argument.  "He needs more around him".    If a guy is good enough to trade away your future, he better be the guy that elevates the team around him.

For the folks who say "He needs time to throw" . . . well here are 11 guys who have been sacked more often, generally hurried more often, blitzed more often and had more balls dropped.

image.thumb.png.2dc41404d39c8a7de31ce4ce9368bc62.png

Here's another way to look at something similar, look at all these guys with LESS pocket time that Bryce.  Now, to be clear, the definition of pocket time here is one I really like.  It's time in the pocket before pressure OR before throwing the ball.  It puts equal weight on the QB making quick decisions and the line protecting.

image.thumb.png.1c0e8aafd4cde45b4fba00f4afd0d8b1.png

To all the folks who say "He needs an offense designed around his arm", I'm blacking out all the guys with less than 30 attempts, but using the same sort order as above.  Now we're looking at downfield throw numbers.  Bear in mind these are ATTEMPTS, not completions.

image.thumb.png.6915843899eacf110d8021431f01d549.png

No one in the league has fewer downfield attempts than Bryce.  It's not because he has so much less time.  It's an impossibility that our staff don't know this.  They know it.  They understand what it is doing to our offense.  Look no further than Andy Dalton.  The Red Rifle has nearly as many 20+ throws (7) in ONE GAME as Bryce has all season (8) . . . IN OUR OFFENSE.

The bottom line is that Bryce is not NFL ready right now.  He needs to sit.  He needs to watch Dalton operate the offense.  To understand how quickly decisions need to be made.  BY still has plenty of time to prove that he can be the guy before heads roll.  But the other 50+ guys on that roster deserve a chance to compete.

 

wow, truly eye opening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Draft picks are better for cap management and production always outperforms athleticism over time.  
    • awesome interview. Love the guy. 
    • all the trades and using PFFs draft rankings and Gemini's analysis: This is a high-value mock draft that effectively uses trade-down strategies to rebuild the Carolina Panthers' defensive interior and add depth to a roster with multiple holes. By turning mid-round capital into a volume of picks, you've secured several "sliding" stars and developmental high-ceiling players. Based on 2026 PFF big board trends and player value, here is the analysis: Draft Grade: A- The Top Picks: Interior Dominance  * 19. Peter Woods (DT, Clemson): Getting Woods at 19 is a steal. Heading into the 2025 season, he was viewed as a potential top-5 talent. While his production dipped slightly, his 4.75 40-yard dash at 315 lbs is elite. He provides the Panthers with a versatile disruptor who can play 3-tech or slide outside.  * 63. Dontay Corleone (DT, Cincinnati): "The Godfather" is one of the best pure nose tackles in the class. Pairing him with Woods creates an immediate identity for the Panthers' front seven. PFF loves his "unmovable" anchor. Securing him at the end of Round 2 after trading down from 51/53 is excellent value. The Mid-Round Steals  * 83. Deontae Lawson (LB, Alabama): Lawson is a high-IQ "green dot" linebacker. Many scouts projected him as a late 1st or early 2nd rounder before an ACL injury in late 2024. Getting a 2-time Alabama captain at 83 to lead the defense is a massive win for culture and stability.  * 130. Drew Allar (QB, Penn State): This is the "high-upside lottery ticket" pick. Allar has prototypical size (6'5", 240 lbs) and a massive arm. His stock fell due to a 2025 ankle injury and inconsistency, but at 130, he’s a low-risk, high-reward backup/successor to Bryce Young if the former No. 1 pick continues to struggle. Trade Analysis & Late Round Value Your strategy of "tier-dropping" (trading 51 for 53/121 and 53 for 63/95) allowed you to stay in the same talent bracket while picking up Kevin Coleman Jr. (WR) and Genesis Smith (S).  * 168. Parker Brailsford (OC, Alabama): Great value for a technical center who can compete for a depth spot.  * 169. Tacario Davis (CB, Washington): At 6'4", he is a rare physical specimen at corner. PFF and other boards often have him as a Day 2 talent; getting him in the 5th round (via the 161 trade) is arguably your best value pick of the draft. Summary of Picks | Pick | Player | Position | School | Analysis | | 19 | Peter Woods | DT | Clemson | Elite traits; Top-10 ceiling. | | 63 | Dontay Corleone | DT | Cincinnati | Best run stuffer in the class. | | 83 | Deontae Lawson | LB | Alabama | Vocal leader; sliding due to injury. | | 121 | Kevin Coleman Jr. | WR | Missouri | Speed threat to complement the room. | | 130 | Drew Allar | QB | Penn State | High-ceiling developmental passer. | | 169 | Tacario Davis | CB | Washington | Massive reach/length for a late flyer. | Final Verdict You addressed the trenches aggressively and took advantage of "injury discounts" on Lawson and Allar. The only minor critique is that the roster still feels thin at Edge (until the 211 pick), but the sheer volume of talent added to the interior DL and Secondary compensates for it.
×
×
  • Create New...