Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worst cumulative record over last 4 years!


panther4life
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Just as recent as earlier in the year you were defending him for the Rock Hill fiasco among other things.

Even if I did, which I don't remember, whatever he did in Rock Hill does not affect the football operations. I don't give a fug about rich Plutocrats in politics---wannabe oligarchs---and I certainly don't give a poo about how Billionaires run their business. They're all crooks, and they really could care less for the little man. fug Tepper, fug politicians, fug Congress, fug Trump and fug Biden, fug the county commissioners, fug all of them! 

And, yes, they only care about issues insomuch as it lines their pockets. The little guys might get some crumbs if we're lucky. So, the next time that you say that I'm defending Tepper (which you really said nothing to do with football per se), remember who you're talking about.

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, weyco2000 said:

Should’ve kept Wilkes, adjusted the style of play to fit his personnel, the players respected him… but he didn’t win pretty enough or didn’t “interview” well enough because God knows that’s at the top of Teppers list.

Wilkes is definitely the best coach we've had under Tepper's watch. But it was the right move to move on from Wilkes. He's not a regime builder. Wilkes did not have the roots in the league to pull in talented coordinators, assistants and position coaches. For the entirety of his tenure as HC, he would have been able to attract McAdoo level talent at best. We wouldn't have Evero. We wouldn't have Brown. And considering both of them are quality HC candidates for us, we owe Reich for bringing them into our organization.

But if Wilkes was head coach material, he'd be a head coach now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Even if I did, which I don't remember, whatever he did in Rock Hill does not affect the football operations. I don't give a fug about rich Plutocrats in politics---wannabe oligarchs---and I certainly don't give a poo about how Billionaires run their business. They're all crooks, and they really could care less for the little man. fug Tepper, fug politicians, fug Congress, fug Trump and fug Biden, fug the county commissioners, fug all of them! 

And, yes, they only care about issues insomuch as it lines their pockets. The little guys might get some crumbs if we're lucky. So, the next time that you say that I'm defending Tepper (which you really said nothing to do with football per se), remember who you're talking about.

How could you not remember telling other people they are being unreasonable for being critical of Tepper? We aren't talking about politics we are talking about your own posts. You're doing the same thing now that you did when asked about past remarks over a certain WR we traded that you also emphatically denied.

You think having a quality and state of the art practice facility wouldn't have some level of impact on the team?

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Captroop said:

Wilkes is definitely the best coach we've had under Tepper's watch. But it was the right move to move on from Wilkes. He's not a regime builder. Wilkes did not have the roots in the league to pull in talented coordinators, assistants and position coaches. For the entirety of his tenure as HC, he would have been able to attract McAdoo level talent at best. We wouldn't have Evero. We wouldn't have Brown. And considering both of them are quality HC candidates for us, we owe Reich for bringing them into our organization.

But if Wilkes was head coach material, he'd be a head coach now.

These HC candidates you speak of and the clown in charge have yet to win a game in 6 tries. Wilkes took over a sinking ship and put them in position to win the division with Sam Darnold at QB… go figure.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frankw said:

How could you not remember telling other people they are being unreasonable for being critical of Tepper? We aren't talking about politics we are talking about your own posts. You're doing the same thing now that you did when asked about past remarks over a certain WR we traded that you also emphatically denied.

You think having a quality and state of the art practice facility wouldn't have some level of impact on the team?

You're such a liar. 

My record is there for anyone that wants to see it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, frankw said:

How could you not remember telling other people they are being unreasonable for being critical of Tepper? We aren't talking about politics we are talking about your own posts. You're doing the same thing now that you did when asked about past remarks over a certain WR we traded that you also emphatically denied.

You think having a quality and state of the art practice facility wouldn't have some level of impact on the team?

And this is what @Frank is referring to. He's such a liar. I wasn't defending Tepper, I just said that all the criticism served no purpose. Like I said, proof positive that the guy just says poo to get cool points.

 

"Perhaps depending on one's perspective. My thing is that piling on really just serves no purpose. It just seems a little juvenile, but you have all types."
 
https://www.carolinahuddle.com/topic/180542-doj-balks-at-tepper’s-rock-hill-bankruptcy-plan-feds-ask-judge-to-block-confirmation/?do=findComment&comment=5986468

I'm tired of mofo's saying that I said this and that, trying to paint some stupid, unsubstantiated point. 

Just like whoever it was trying to insinuate that I was bashing all these QBs.

It's not my style.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

You're such a liar. 

My record is there for anyone that wants to see it. 

 

 

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

And, also @frankw I'm not like you and said that I never said anything. You just embellish and lie about what I say in order to get your cool points. I told you what I said, and I stand by it. 

 

45 minutes ago, top dawg said:

And this is what @Frank is referring to. He's such a liar. I wasn't defending Tepper, I just said that all the criticism served no purpose. Like I said, proof positive that the guy just says poo to get cool points.

 

"Perhaps depending on one's perspective. My thing is that piling on really just serves no purpose. It just seems a little juvenile, but you have all types."
 
https://www.carolinahuddle.com/topic/180542-doj-balks-at-tepper’s-rock-hill-bankruptcy-plan-feds-ask-judge-to-block-confirmation/?do=findComment&comment=5986468

I'm tired of mofo's saying that I said this and that, trying to paint some stupid, unsubstantiated point. 

Just like whoever it was trying to insinuate that I was bashing all these QBs.

It's not my style.

Sir. You sought out OP to get on his case when he suggested there have been Tepper apologists. And when asked about your own history in defense of Mr. Tepper you've proceeded to have a meltdown.

Why don't we just agree that the stakes have changed and Tepper has worn out his free passes that some people extended to him? He did indeed have some apologists. There was even one poster here who basically dedicated his entire account to posting about him. Remember the Appaloosa Model? We're a long way from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, frankw said:

 

 

Sir. You sought out OP to get on his case when he suggested there have been Tepper apologists. And when asked about your own history in defense of Mr. Tepper you've proceeded to have a meltdown.

Why don't we just agree that the stakes have changed and Tepper has worn out his free passes that some people extended to him? He did indeed have some apologists. There was even one poster here who basically dedicated his entire account to posting about him. Remember the Appaloosa Model? We're a long way from that.

And, like I said, the honeymoon has been over a long time ago. Unlike some posters, I generally don't come out and make definitive statements about someone right off the bat. I give them time to develop a record. Some people want immediate results, and that's not how this thing works. Ironically, if Tepper wasn't so impatient, the Panthers just might have better results than what's gone on since 2018. 

Now stop embellishing my posts, basically attributing poo to me that was never true, and we'll get along a lot better. 

Edited by top dawg
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, top dawg said:

And, like I said, the honeymoon has been over a long time ago. Unlike some posters, I generally don't come out and make definitive statements about someone right off the bat. I give them time to develop a record. Some people want immediate results, and that's not how this thing works. Ironically, if Tepper wasn't so impatient, the Panthers just might have better results than what's gone on since 2018. 

Now stop embellishing my posts, basically attributing poo to me that was never true, and we'll get along a lot better. 

I agree with most of your points you touched on about billionaires and the elite class. I don't wade into it much because it's a futile effort the system is built to be exploited and manipulated by those in power in this structure and that won't change in our lifetimes.

Back to football.

The losing is having a fog effect on all of us I'd say that's why every thread eventually becomes tense and people let out their frustrations. It's perfectly fine I'd rather people do that here than other places or in other ways. It's good to vent. We've been through the ringer.

With Tepper I fear his impulsiveness could make this volatile situation even worse if that's somehow possible. Wherever he goes from here in regards to Reich's future or the next coach he has to remove himself from the equation some. Nothing will get better without that no matter who we hire next.

We've argued for years over what ultimately amounted to inane issues this is just another one. We can't control any of it regardless. I respect your passion for your team it's good that you're fired up. We lost a ton of bandwagoners through the last 4 years or so. Loyal fans who have stuck through it all deserve better than this. We'll see if there's a light at the end of the tunnel anytime soon. Maybe not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...