Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB School - Bryce Young vs Miami


Coheed
 Share

Recommended Posts

Love Sullivans content. I think his Patreon supporters get more plays broken down. There’s a lot of good happening and then there the bad. It’s a mixed bag. Which is to be expected at this point. The promising thing is he has indeed shown improvement every week. We just have to hope it continues. 
 

The deep ball attempts would be better if he at least gave Chark a chance to get pass interference but he was rushed. 
 

I don’t see what some folks see. Bryce CAN make every throw. That’s a fact. Bryce DOES have to be more precise with those throws other QBs can get away with. He doesn’t have a cannon or an above average arm. 
 

You don’t need one to win and it makes me question how much of the play calling has been limited by their deep ball success in practice. 
 

All in all… I see progress. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rags said:

My brother in christ you are literally saying "if you don't agree with me, you lack logic" that's not something you can converse with lol

I think you misread the post from the jump. It wasn't an attack on you. I was simply stating that right now Young has probably at best an average or below average NFL arm. He's only 22 and that could change. But the situation is the situation currently. It's difficult to reconcile with the fact that's what we traded up to at number one overall. I don't like it either but it's a reality I'm going to accept for the time being.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Rags said:

I would love to see the passing charts and for which games, because there were absolutely games D.J. had the greenlight on one on ones down field and Teddy just. Wouldn't. 

But even then, great, we're still comparing a 7 (?) year vet with a much more competent offensive supporting cast (two 1,000 yard WRs, Mike Davis) and a rookie learning in the NFL. And even then he's still been going over the middle more and more recently. 

Teddy was a checkdown and conservative QB.  And I'm not comparing a vet to a rookie.  But people keep saying that Bryce is attacking downfield more than Teddy and that is just factually wrong.   It is non-existent under Bryce for whatever reason.  

Teddy Bridgewater Week 8 Pass Chart

Teddy Bridgewater Week 7 Pass Chart

 

Teddy Bridgewater Week 10 Pass ChartTeddy Bridgewater Week 9 Pass Chart

Teddy Bridgewater Week 10 Pass Chart

that's just a 4 game stretch.   Only shows week 5-17.  But overall, yeah, Teddy went downfield much more than Bryce Young has and it's not much of a debate.  And Teddy hated doing that.  It doesn't exist under Bryce.  It sporadically was part of Teddy's game here. 

most certainly there can be debate about why Bryce isn't.  Might have little to do with Bryce.  But he isn't.  And Teddy did it much more consistently.  So rookie Bryce isn't even close to threatening downfield as much as one of the biggest check downers and conservative throwers we have seen. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I think that was fitt knowing he stepped in it before the preseason and knew young wasnt ready yet

 

I never bought the fluff but then again I didnt think bryce would be this bad

And this is the point of contention, this isn't just on Bryce. This team is bad. 

I don't think there's many who don't wish Stroud was the pick, but we have Bryce and many of us think there's things to work with and also this would still be a terrible situation for Stroud or Richardson. 

And also I think it's pretty unanimous Fitt poo the bed and should be shown the door. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rags said:

And this is the point of contention, this isn't just on Bryce. This team is bad. 

I don't think there's many who don't wish Stroud was the pick, but we have Bryce and many of us think there's things to work with and also this would still be a terrible situation for Stroud or Richardson. 

And also I think it's pretty unanimous Fitt poo the bed and should be shown the door. 

I dont disagree with any of that

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

I think you misread the post from the jump. It wasn't an attack on you. I was simply stating that right now Young has probably at best an average or below average NFL arm. He's only 22 and that could change. But the situation is the situation currently. It's difficult to reconcile with the fact that's what we traded up to at number one overall. I don't like it either but it's a reality I'm going to accept for the time being.

In order for you (well me) to really try to evaluate Young this year I had to accept 2 things.  One we shouldn't have traded what we traded to draft him, and two Stroud was the better choice.  Now all of that is a sunk cost and water under the bridge and I am looking at Young progressing to see if he can become our QB of the future, which to me he is showing some signs of life and progression.  If we can walk away from this with Young developing into our franchise QB it would be a win at this point.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Teddy was a checkdown and conservative QB.  And I'm not comparing a vet to a rookie.  But people keep saying that Bryce is attacking downfield more than Teddy and that is just factually wrong.   It is non-existent under Bryce for whatever reason.  

Teddy Bridgewater Week 8 Pass Chart

Teddy Bridgewater Week 7 Pass Chart

 

Teddy Bridgewater Week 10 Pass ChartTeddy Bridgewater Week 9 Pass Chart

Teddy Bridgewater Week 10 Pass Chart

that's just a couple.  Only shows week 5-17.  But overall, yeah, Teddy went downfield much more and than Bryce Young has and it's not much of a debate.  And Teddy hated doing that.  It doesn't exist under Bryce.  It sporadically was part of Teddy's game here. 

Maybe deep yeah, but it’s the lack of intermediate throws that drove me mad with Teddy, and us this year the first 3 games. At least we’ve seen more 15-20 yard passes the last few.

IMG_7244.jpeg

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I am looking at Young progressing to see if he can become our QB of the future, which to me he is showing some signs of life and progression.  If we can walk away from this with Young developing into our franchise QB it would be a win at this point.  

Sure thats where most of us are, except now you have a faction, me included, wondering what his ceiling truly is.  Did we trade all that capital for a severely limited qb that needs a very specific offense to be effective?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Teddy was a checkdown and conservative QB.  And I'm not comparing a vet to a rookie.  But people keep saying that Bryce is attacking downfield more than Teddy and that is just factually wrong.   It is non-existent under Bryce for whatever reason.  

Teddy Bridgewater Week 8 Pass Chart

Teddy Bridgewater Week 7 Pass Chart

 

Teddy Bridgewater Week 10 Pass ChartTeddy Bridgewater Week 9 Pass Chart

Teddy Bridgewater Week 10 Pass Chart

that's just a couple.  Only shows week 5-17.  But overall, yeah, Teddy went downfield much more and than Bryce Young has and it's not much of a debate.  And Teddy hated doing that.  It doesn't exist under Bryce.  It sporadically was part of Teddy's game here. 

So how deep are we going to say is "okay" Here? Because using Bryce's Week 6 chart We did get a 32 yarder, and in week 1 we did get a 40+ (which I don't remember at all)  which is only 2 less 40s than 

Which is concerning, but also, given our offensive struggles and the fact again Teddy had the better WR core (D.j., Curt and Robby was a powerful trio) I am going to argue that Bryce would take mroe shots with that cast than this one that notably isn't getting a ton of separation. 

But more importantly it's only 3 less 30 yard attempts than what Dalton put out in Week 3. I am willing to lean that it is more of a cast thing than it JUST being Bryce's ability to throw deep. 

Also after typing this up and looking at (at least Bryce's week 6 chart) and what you've put here for Teddy, teddy didn't throw +15 often, Bryce is and over the middle too. That's the differences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rags said:

So how deep are we going to say is "okay" Here? Because using Bryce's Week 6 chart We did get a 32 yarder, and in week 1 we did get a 40+ (which I don't remember at all)  which is only 2 less 40s than 

Which is concerning, but also, given our offensive struggles and the fact again Teddy had the better WR core (D.j., Curt and Robby was a powerful trio) I am going to argue that Bryce would take mroe shots with that cast than this one that notably isn't getting a ton of separation. 

But more importantly it's only 3 less 30 yard attempts than what Dalton put out in Week 3. I am willing to lean that it is more of a cast thing than it JUST being Bryce's ability to throw deep. 

Also after typing this up and looking at (at least Bryce's week 6 chart) and what you've put here for Teddy, teddy didn't throw +15 often, Bryce is and over the middle too. That's the differences. 

I honestly think it’s mostly a combination of the cast and Bryce adjusting to the game at the next level. Hoping to see him settle his feet and take more shots once Corbett is back and hopefully he can connect on more throws likes the one he missed to chark because he doesn’t have a DT in his face the second the ball is snapped. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Rags said:

Listen man if u wanna buy into team fluff cool, great. Sometimes it works on me too.

I reeled it back when our GM publicly said "Yeah we're gonna suck" before week 1.

It was pretty well documented across the board that Bryce was the highest floor, lowest ceiling of the top 3. He was the most NFL ready to start day 1. Thats what was being said about his abilities. Not he's a rookie and you're going to need to be patient and wait 2 or 3 years. He was ready to go now. Posters who questioned this before the draft were poo'd on and called idiots because we couldn't see everything that the experts saw. 

We're 6 weeks in and all of a sudden that narrative has completely flipped and we need to be patient and he's only a rookie and there's growing pains and blah, blah, blah. 

I look at it like this. Either our GM, coaches and scouts really missed on his evaluation and his trade up value because he's not ready to be an NFL starting QB week 1 like was claimed, OR, this is what some of us thought it was and a drastic overpay for a QB that has the lowest ceiling of the 3. 

Either option is bad, but the first is actually worse because it involves every player this staff evaluates and not just the QB position. But now we have given up our WR1, our 23' 1st, our 24' 1st, and a 2nd just to go backwards? You don't make that trade if you can't do better than the year before, and right now we're swimming in the sewer with no way out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...