Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is JC Horn marketable?

Kick

By Kick,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CLG Experienced

CLG

Posted
Posted

He will be in the league a long time with his current tape, I think. He just is starting to look like he’ll never be the player he couldve been but could still improve a secondary and be really good. 
 

Almost reminds of TDs early injury misfortune. Still ended up being a hell of a player but maybe not what he could have been. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChibCU Experienced

ChibCU

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CBDellinger said:

No it wouldn’t be prudent to trade our only corner who also happens to still be on his rookie deal with a 5th year option.    Keep him and sign someone legit opposite him.  

Opposite him and behind him*

Since his back-up will actually be the starter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, CLG said:

He will be in the league a long time with his current tape, I think. He just is starting to look like he’ll never be the player he couldve been but could still improve a secondary and be really good. 
 

Almost reminds of TDs early injury misfortune. Still ended up being a hell of a player but maybe not what he could have been. 

Good perspective. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

he is marketable in the sense he is a high tier player when healthy and has another year on his rookie deal.  So if you are a good team.  He would make a lot of sense if you had a hole in your secondary. 

we can't extend his contract.  not to a deal that matches his talent.   we aren't going to do anything of note next year.  Right thing for us given his history would be to let him walk.  I would trade him if you could find a deal for him.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

No it wouldn’t be prudent to trade our only corner who also happens to still be on his rookie deal with a 5th year option.    Keep him and sign someone legit opposite him.  

we are rebuilding though.  We aren't contending this year or next.  So what purpose does he really serve if he isn't part of the long term plan.  And Horn shouldn't be part of the long term plan and be here after his rookie deal is over.  His injury history says we shouldn't extend him to money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CBDellinger Mentor

CBDellinger

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, CRA said:

we are rebuilding though.  We aren't contending this year or next.  So what purpose does he really serve if he isn't part of the long term plan.  And Horn shouldn't be part of the long term plan and be here after his rookie deal is over.  His injury history says we shouldn't extend him to money. 

hes cheap and if he gets healthy and balls out you have the option for another year at an affordable rate.  he doesnt hold much trade value at this point, why create another hole on the roster and eat his dead money?  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

hes cheap and if he gets healthy and balls out you have the option for another year at an affordable rate.  he doesnt hold much trade value at this point, why create another hole on the roster and eat his dead money?  

 

 

I get he is cheap now.  But that's also what would make him potentially attractive to a good team. 

you want them to extend and pay a DB that has been that comically injured? If you don't.....then he isn't part of our plans.  Even if he balls out this team isn't going to do anything next year.   So he just ends up walking.  Why not get stuff for assets that aren't part of the long term plan.  Because our future success would have to be in the long term not short term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      What a franchise QB looks like

      By strato · Posted

      I think the racist stuff is barking up the wrong tree with Tepper. He is all woke and stuff. Not that liberal white people can’t be racists they are in their way pretty racist.  Or can be,  I for sure agree about the yes man aspect and particularly apply that to Wilks.  I didn’t understand the Rhule hiring at all. Did not want. But down the line with Wilks, zi personally wanted him, and personally did not see the racism being a factor in the Reich hiring as much as the fixation with offensive minded play callers and copying that trendy model.  I am having a hard time calling to mind any Black coaches who were out there with the big offensive rep. At one time Byron Leftwich was a hot name who I liked. Don’t remember what happened there but he faded. Bienemy but I never believed in him much, personally.  I think Tepper basically excluded defensive guys and went for the top rated play caller OC types. And couldn’t get Ben Johnson and ended up settling with Reich.  Who ended up NOT being a yes man at all. 
    • Jackson113.2
      What a franchise QB looks like

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

      Someone like Steve Smith wouldn't have last half a season under Tepper.
    • Proudiddy
      Prediction

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      Idk what we look like against the Rams.  I do know that any idea of making the playoffs is over.  What Canales has proven is when we need it, we don’t get it.  When we don’t need it or it’s unexpected, we usually get it.  We’ve lost too many games already that should’ve been wins for us to make up ground on the back end.  
×
×
  • Create New...