Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this fanbase not suited for a rookie QB?


BrisbanePanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I keep seeing "blame the fans". I don't think the question sounds like a fan-blaming one as much as what we have appetite for. Our last rookie actually played regular season games was out of this world and an atypical rookie--just like Stroud. So maybe this fanbase can indeed be suited for a rookie QB, it just has to be one that takes off like a rocket. We want competent QB play from the jump and typical rookie suckage in year 1 (especially that was traded up for) is not our bag. I think that's the podcast's point.

Remember, we had plenty of people who wanted Carr rather than a rookie for the exact reason of the risk of feast-or-famine uncertainty. Carr won't make the HOF but you knew what you were getting. I wasn't in favor of getting Carr but I have to admit that Carr with Moore and probably Skoronski drafted at 9 would probably have more than one win, but some would still wonder about the franchise's long-term future.

Either way, life for future rookies across the league gets a lot harder thanks to Stroud. They will all be compared to him for a long time.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the main issue is that we're seeing CJ Stroud have record breaking success in Houston, and many fans were split predraft on Young/Stroud.

We had a great time between Jake and Cam, and then we've spent the past five years trying to figure it out.  We were sold that we'd no longer be picking top 20 anymore.  We have a billion years of coaching experience.  Being disappointed is extremely fair.  While I'm not going to trash the team (because I do remember the years before the Panthers), to each their own.  

I will say that regardless of who was QB here, if we did have the magic ability to change who we drafted, they would be struggling the same.  Here are the offensive issues we have regardless of who is taking snaps:

1. Poor overall WR play/speed.  We hear it week after week, but the FO did a poo job making decisions about WRs.

2. Poor OL play.  From Icky falling off a cliff into the Byron Bell school of OT, to the complete poo show of Guard play, to the fact that the offense isn't schemed for their success.  Coaches and FO are not seeing eye to eye, which is a BIG problem.

3. The lack of synergy between the coaching staff and FO.  Again, this is super surprising to me since Scott HIRED Frank.  They should be hand in hand, executing a plan.  If not - the good job Dave, you fugged this up AGAIN.  

When you watch Stroud, or AR before the injury, they were able to make plays because their line gave them enough time for the plays to develop.  While Bryce has several coverage sacks on him, there are TONS of times where the opponents D is in his face before he hits the back of his drop.  There is no playmaking that happens there.  Someone brough up the David Carr'ing of Bryce, and that could be a real issue.

I turned off the game after his first pick six.  Why?  Because I knew we'd run out of time, and that was a do or die drive.  I'm also no stress about rookies throwing picks.  It happens to most rookie QBs.  Maybe CJ Stroud is QB jesus, which is great for him and Houston, but we can't change the past.  The fact is most rookies struggle in their first year.  We've seen spots of great play and potential from Bryce, and I think he's going to be good for us.  We just have to figure out how to build the team around him.

This is straight on the desk of Frank, Scott and Tepper.  They have to get it straightened out before it's too late for Bryce.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your immediate instinct isn't to question the ownership and front office but to blame the fanbase maybe it's you.

The fans will support anyone who isn't the worst starting QB in the NFL in multiple statistical rankings.

Also some of your ramblings make it sound like no one could have possibly predicted Stroud would be so good. As if his arm talent didn't practically slap you in the face on his game tape. It was always there for anyone to see.

Edited by frankw
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

Reminded me a lot of the game at Detroit Cam’s rookie season 

Nothing Bryce does reminds me of anything Cam did. Cam had physical skills that we could all see would make him good. Bryce,  he looks like a high school kid playing in the pros. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TN05 said:

We’re suited just fine for a rookie QB, we’re just not suited for a garbage QB that’s somehow worse than everyone since and including Cam. We traded our present and future for someone who apparently can’t throw deep and who, despite being touted as an unparalleled analytic mind, makes some of the dumbest turnovers you’ll ever see. 

pretty much all that needs to be said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

If your immediate instinct isn't to question the ownership and front office but to blame the fanbase maybe it's you.

The fans will support anyone who isn't the worst starting QB in the NFL in multiple statistical rankings.

Bro, hold up — half this fan base didn’t support Bryce after the first possession of the opening preseason game. Now, I mean, you don’t even believe what you just wrote. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Bro, hold up — half this fan base didn’t support Bryce after the first possession of the opening preseason game. Now, I mean, you don’t even believe what you just wrote. 

The reality is that Bryce looked just like this during the preseason and lots of folks nervously laughed it off and lectured about how serious fans know that preseason doesn't matter and how much better Bryce and the team would look during the regular season with actual game planning.

Now harsh reality is sinking in. 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TAMU had such a weird draft. Usually you'd be bragging your ass off about three DL drafted in the top two rounds except that the narrative around all three was about how badly they were misused by TAMU. LOL
    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that want a little more: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
×
×
  • Create New...