Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank leaves the door open to taking back playcalling duties


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

I will say now looking at this from a coach perspective. Frank probably was trying to save Bryce from embarrassment with the play calls. He knows he can't run the offense the way it's setup due to his limitations. So he made the playbook simple hoping he could do the minimum until they could teach him more. Just my opinion.

Edited by Bigdaddy8523
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Basbear said:

If franks gets lucky and stays around, tepper will needa sacrificial meat to allow it.

Brown was not in "franks good old boyz" club and hes the OC, right?? Well the offense has been dumpster water and the person in charge there is Brown. Makes sense and all it takes is to sell tepper....

 

I feel the opposite.  If he wants a sacrificial lamb then he would just let thomas brown keep calling terrible plays for this terrible offense.   If anything this is Reich falling on the sword.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Literally every part of our franchise plays a part in why we suck.  From the owner for not having a football consultant to make football moves, to out gm and scouts for bad drafts and trades and having the least talented overall roster in the NFL, to the coaches (besides Evero, I think hes been good, especially considering injuries) for using really dated schemes that dont fit our players at all and calling everything over conservatively, to our players who for the most part aren't executing or have clear flaws in their game.  Including Bryce, who has been thrown in an impossible situation with no talent around him but some of the blame is also on him.  There is no quick fix.

Edited by Tr3ach
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I wanted to see what the offense looked like with a different play caller. Well, I saw.

I can't help but to keep going back and recalling what it looked like that one game with a different QB though.

Most points scored all season.

Still people can't accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole offensive scheme is trash and it’s obvious the other teams have it figured out 

that being said I think besides some on this coaching staff the whole scouting dept needs firing. There’s plenty of huddlers on here that could do a better job.
 

Missing on every 2nd round and later picks for several years now is insane and the surest way of depleting your team of depth and talent 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Byrdman4real said:

It doesn't matter who call the plays. The scheme is complete garbage and the playbook is too. fuging tecmo bowl playbook. 

Bingo!!! You are 100% correct. It is like they schemed a playbook around a QB that they had little confidence he would be able to play in a up tempo mode, so now we are stuck with a scheme that is total garbage. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

Bingo!!! You are 100% correct. It is like they schemed a playbook around a QB that they had little confidence he would be able to play in a up tempo mode, so now we are stuck with a scheme that is total garbage. 

I am getting tired of every single drive seeming to go into double digit plays. We are incapable of scoring quickly.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...