Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think the 2001 team and 2010 team would beat this team?

Sean Payton's Vicodin

By Sean Payton's Vicodin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted (edited)

2001 was in several games and found ways to lose at the end. 
 

2010 was the closest to this team in terms of offensive ineptitude.

Both teams however had foundational pieces. 01 actually had a ton of guys who were in the Super Bowl two years later. 10 still had smith and Stewart. 
 

I think we lose to 2001 by 7-10 points. The game with 2010 we might win half the time if we played them 10 times. 

Edited by BIGH2001
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

2001 was in several games and found ways to lose at the end. 
 

2010 was the closest to this team in terms of offensive ineptitude.

Both teams however had foundational pieces. 01 actually had a ton of guys who were in the Super Bowl two years later. 10 still had smith and Stewart. 
 

I think we lose to 2001 by 7-10 points. The game with 2010 we might win half the time if we played them 10 times. 

The 2001 team was scrappy, but couldn't seal the deal at the end of games.  They didn't look like a one win team until the last couple of games when they clearly packed it in.  That '01 squad really could have been a 5 win team if they win several of the one score games that ended up as losses.  It wasn't a horrible roster, but Seifert's decision to discard Steve Beuerlein in favor of a new QB was the deal breaker.  If Steve was still the QB, I'm not saying playoffs, but at least a .500 team.

The common thread in all three seasons, rookie QBs who look bad, REALLY bad.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wundrbread33 Grand Master

Wundrbread33

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Don’t forget Moore threw 3 picks against NYG in the season opener.  He was not having an All-Pro season 

I always had a feeling that Moore regressed because he didn’t feel secure with the team drafting Clausen high in the draft. 
 

Could be wrong, but he looked like he was pressing instead of playing free the year before. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

I always had a feeling that Moore regressed because he didn’t feel secure with the team drafting Clausen high in the draft. 
 

Could be wrong, but he looked like he was pressing instead of playing free the year before. 
 

 

He also had an offseason of teams able to review what he did at the end of 2009, and he simply wasn't able to adjust. All three of his picks in Week 1 were awful, awful throws -- IIRC, all of them in field goal range too. Moore wasn't a terrible QB, but he just didn't have it then. And then in Week 2, we only scored 7 points. That's with two healthy All-Pro RBs, Steve Smith, etc.

Edited by Carl Spackler
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson

      By Basbear · Posted

      I did not want to start or even think about *if* BY reverts back to pre-non last 9 games.   There is a lane in which Panthers are looking QB after this season, I feel its higher than most will realize. I mean....not kidding... has any team ever traded up to 1st overall twice in the teams history? I don't even want to think within 3 years, just foresee Tepper squeezing Dans and Brandts sacs to the point were they are forced to trade up for a another savior.....   The kicker is I feel this way with BY playing good-great..... I think there with be non-fixable problems for contract negotiations between BY&reps vs Panthers org on the whole. You can not pay 50+ million per over few years with 70% guarantees for 3,303 yards 15 TDs and 9 INTs......Cursed I tell you....
    • TD alt
      Did Cam Really Say This??

      By TD alt · Posted

      It's not surprising, but it's still surprising that many of these guys don't manage their money in such a way that provides them and their families a better lifestyle than most for the rest of their lives without even working a nine-to-five. I can't imagine making over a 100 mil for a decade and ultimately ruminating about supporting my family due to financial issues.
    • Basbear
      Around the NFL

      By Basbear · Posted

      That why i mentioned the KC dynasty. Those three different playoff loses were not Allens fault, in fact 1-2 plays and Bills win. KC just have better players and better coaches and more luck.  Defense-wise, Bills have been trying to crack the Reid-Halhomes magic. Its near impossible with rules and KC home field advantage. Spags has started to force the league in naming him the best DC in NFL history. I agree if you take away Bill bielacheat.... Add in Andy Reid the best QB coach and brilliant play designer/play-caller, I mean that's too much for one QB to over-come on his own.  Just trolling or not, bad is bad scot. Allen is legit as any one QB has ever been. 
×
×
  • Create New...