Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young has half a season under his belt now and here are his projections


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

62.8% Completions

17 Passing Touchdowns

15 Interceptions

3315 Passing Yards ( 195 per game ) 

287 Rushing Yards ( 17 per game )

 

We don’t have a first round pick next year, we aren’t bringing in a big WR free agent and we aren’t making a trade for a top tier one. We have already switched playcallers and the offense has gotten worse. If Frank gets fired Bryce will be another rookie QB who gets a year wasted and then basically be a rookie again in year 2 with a new coach and a new system. 
 

The hell do we do to get better next year and support him?

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jaxel said:

I mean, I would be shocked if they don't invest every dollar in the offense this off season.

I’d agree but what can they even do? If we are being realistic and look at who could be available via free agency we need to understand that most of the “top” guys aren’t going to actually hit the market. And those that do aren’t going to come here unless it’s some massive overpay because why come here with a newer coach, a young QB who is struggling, no real run game and the line looks like one of the worst in the NFL. 
 

We would need to make a trade and I feel like the only piece worth a good offensive player we have is Burns and it seems the trade Burns ship has sailed as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the Pats offense has been poo, but I wonder if we sign O’Brien as our OC next year to reunite Young with his college OC. If we keep this zone blocking switching Icky and BC might work providing we sign a serviceable backup for LT. Draft a weapon like Tez with our 2nd and an explosive RB on the mid rounds. I could also see us trying to trade for Aiyuk because San Fran might not be able to afford him as an alternate plan. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Varking said:

I’d agree but what can they even do? If we are being realistic and look at who could be available via free agency we need to understand that most of the “top” guys aren’t going to actually hit the market. And those that do aren’t going to come here unless it’s some massive overpay because why come here with a newer coach, a young QB who is struggling, no real run game and the line looks like one of the worst in the NFL. 
 

We would need to make a trade and I feel like the only piece worth a good offensive player we have is Burns and it seems the trade Burns ship has sailed as well. 

You aren't gonna find a number 1, but we need some one fast a twitchy, and a lot of o line depth. The reality is, at some point we are going to have to hit on a wr in the draft. If that means taking 3 them, then so be it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

yeah they are absolutely going to spend big in free agency, don’t know why you’d assume otherwise

Those free agents would need to choose us over others. We had Foreman leave to pick the Bears despite knowing they had a deeper RB room than us. 
 

We are currently 13th in cap space going into next year and we still haven’t paid Burns. We have 40 million available as of now to spend. He’s looking for top DE money. What will that leave us with? So who are the free agents we can target at that point? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Varking said:

Those free agents would need to choose us over others. We had Foreman leave to pick the Bears despite knowing they had a deeper RB room than us. 
 

We are currently 13th in cap space going into next year and we still haven’t paid Burns. We have 40 million available as of now to spend. He’s looking for top DE money. What will that leave us with? So who are the free agents we can target at that point? 

And luvu

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Varking said:

Those free agents would need to choose us over others. We had Foreman leave to pick the Bears despite knowing they had a deeper RB room than us. 
 

We are currently 13th in cap space going into next year and we still haven’t paid Burns. We have 40 million available as of now to spend. He’s looking for top DE money. What will that leave us with? So who are the free agents we can target at that point? 

Paying Burns should reduce his cap hit next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to go after Tee Higgins.  The best wide receiver on the market and will only be 25 years old.  And he's proven himself.  Overpay him if you have to.

I'm not saying Higgins is as good as these guys (but he does have that kind of upside).  But look at the impact guys like Diggs, AJ Brown, and Hill have had on their QBs.  Sometimes you just need that special talent at WR.  It makes everyones job easier.  I really feel like that is the move we HAVE to pursue the most and pray and hope he takes the money. 

Otherwise I don't know how you get a true #1 without either getting lucky in the draft or trading even more picks for someone in the NFL, which we shouldn't do.  If we did make a trade though, Aiyuk would be my top option.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mage said:

We have to go after Tee Higgins.  The best wide receiver on the market and will only be 25 years old.  And he's proven himself.  Overpay him if you have to.

I'm not saying Higgins is as good as these guys (but he does have that kind of upside).  But look at the impact guys like Diggs, AJ Brown, and Hill have had on their QBs.  Sometimes you just need that special talent at WR.  It makes everyones job easier.  I really feel like that is the move we HAVE to pursue the most and pray and hope he takes the money. 

Otherwise I don't know how you get a true #1 without either getting lucky in the draft or trading even more picks for someone in the NFL, which we shouldn't do.  If we did make a trade though, Aiyuk would be my top option.

We would have to way overpay him to come here.   

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...