Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Texans Team as a Whole


SaltAndPepper
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Schultz over Hurst

I wanted schultz big time, shocked that he only got a 1 year 6.5 deal(dallas tagged him the year before). I did like most of off-season FA signees, but not hurst @ 4year for 30ish. I will say hurst blocks better, but passing wise no contest...

tremble feels like the starter currently. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I wanted schultz big time, shocked that he only got a 1 year 6.5 deal(dallas tagged him the year before). I did like most of off-season FA signees, but not hurst @ 4year for 30ish. I will say hurst blocks better, but passing wise no contest...

tremble feels like the starter currently. 

Hurst might miss the game with his concussion, but Ian Thomas is back.  I hope Thomas doesn't take time away from Tremble as he is my favorite TE on the roster right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Coaching coaching coaching

(if we say it three times, does it just start happening effectively?)

This team could bring in prime Don Shula and it wouldn’t matter. There’s nothing  really much you can do to make up for Bryce’s physical disadvantages.

There’s a reason there has only been a few successful QBs under 6ft to play in the NFL.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean when you hire a coach that relates really well to young black men and can lead them as well as he led on the field, the players execute and play better? Who would have thought!

Ryans is a slam dunk hire for them and proof you don't need a offensive head coach, just a leader of men and a good game manager.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

This team could bring in prime Don Shula and it wouldn’t matter. There’s nothing  really much you can do to make up for Bryce’s physical disadvantages.

There’s a reason there has only been a few successful QBs under 6ft to play in the NFL.

So the counter is that swapping Young for Stroud (or Levis or Mac Jones or any other QB over 6 ft) is the only difference here? We suck because Bryce is too short and slight and can't throw more than five yards to make better use of Fitt's roster? He's the problem 100%?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

So the counter is that swapping Young for Stroud (or Levis or Mac Jones or any other QB over 6 ft) is the only difference here? We suck because Bryce is too short and slight and can't throw more than five yards to make better use of Fitt's roster? He's the problem 100%?

Not 100% but you’re in denial if you don’t think it’s a major factor.

What other reason would you give as to why there has hardly been any successful QBs under 6ft in the history of the NFL?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

He wasn't the only one reporting this.

Back during pre-draft days, pretty much everyone believed the Texans had Young as their top prospect.

Well...thanks to tipper those fkers dodged a bullet.... Wilson and Murry both have wheels which contributes to their success..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Not 100% but you’re in denial if you don’t think it’s a major factor.

What other reason would you give as to why there has hardly been any successful QBs under 6ft in the history of the NFL?

I'd guess the percentage of QBs in NFL history is probably less than 1% and that'd be because of a combination of old school views of who has the body type and who does, so that makes the pool automatically smaller. But if there's been 10 starting QBs under 6 ft and three of them are successful--that's a 30% hit rate, which I suspect is higher than the hit rate of 6ft+ QBs but is an infinitesimal number for all QBs. OTOH, there's also been no successful 7ft QBs either (or any over 6'7" IIRC). If height was a key to success, you'd see taller QBs and we just don't see them. Plus, there's surely no material difference between a 5'11 QB and a 6' one.

I think part of the reason why people are watching Bryce is to see if he changes the conversation on who can play QB for this exact reason. Many are hoping he's like Steph Curry (even though Steph is not that short, but he was very slight) for football. That would significantly expand the pool of potential players, which would only be good for the sport.

If he fails, that'll probably be the end of this experiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...