Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible GMs IF Scott is Fired.


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

There is a lot of unknowns going into this offseason. Mike Kaye brought it up on Kyle Bailey’s show that even though this job isn’t appealing at the moment, it might not be appealing to a first time GM but a retread might see it as a good possibility.

Two names he brought up were Dave Caldwell (Former Jags now with the Eagles) and Tom Dimitroff (former falcons GM now running a private firm for nfl scouting) 

I know Adam Peters is the golden calf but I’m of the belief he’s in San Fran till he retires.

I figured why not throw around some names.

Scott isn’t safe…where there is smoke there is fire and no one has seen Scott or heard from him…he wasn’t at the press conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cmon now, nobody on here is knowledgable enough of up and coming front office members of other teams to be able to speak intelligently on this topic.

Closest we could get to it is saying we'd love to steal someone from a team like the Eagles who constantly make great personnel decisions.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting on Thomas Dimitroff. He had some success in Atlanta. Sumersports is the company he started, it’s an analytics based scouting firm so that may catch Tepper’s eye. He also has connections to NE, hence Belichick. 
 

Personally, I still think Tepper is going to go after a HC/GM type and potentially keep Morgan and Samir to support that.
 

However, two guys I would watch other than Peters (who will have his fair share of options) are:

Andy Weidl, Asst GM- PIT

Mike Borgonzi, Asst GM- KC
 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Cmon now, nobody on here is knowledgable enough of up and coming front office members of other teams to be able to speak intelligently on this topic.

Closest we could get to it is saying we'd love to steal someone from a team like the Eagles who constantly make great personnel decisions.

I’ll wait on Mr. Scot’s post on this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peters is the only one I would be thrilled about at this point. He wouldn't take the job unless the entire internal system was changed up to something functional. He has seen where this club has to go if it really wants to turn around.

I just don't know enough about who is really who anymore. Some of the floated names are big old eye rolls like some of the HC prospects. I get that it could happen but some really shouldn't in this specific case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...