Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CFB conference championship games

LinvilleGorge

By LinvilleGorge,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

GhostWhispah Rising Star

GhostWhispah

Posted
Posted
On 12/1/2023 at 6:19 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bo Nix 30 years old and still not the best QB in college football. That's tuff!

Bo Is the next Weeden, old farts who think they have potential NFL but are half way towards retiring when their rookie teammates can't relate to them. And what the heck does CFB stand for cause i don't know.

https://youtu.be/NTCXBAQDqv4?si=f1NjDV42EE_a4V8n

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted

The best teams are:

1. Washington

2. Oregon

3. Alabama 

4. Georgia 

5. Michigan

6. Texas(if they still had their QB they would be higher)

7. Ohio St.

After that it's a decent sized pool of relatively evenly matched teams.

 

The committee will have:

1. Michigan 

2. Washington

3. Florida State(shouldn't even be in the discussion at all, literally not a top 10 team)

4. Alabama(they can't help themselves)

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The best teams are:

1. Washington

2. Oregon

3. Alabama 

4. Georgia 

5. Michigan

6. Texas(if they still had their QB they would be higher)

7. Ohio St.

After that it's a decent sized pool of relatively evenly matched teams.

 

The committee will have:

1. Michigan 

2. Washington

3. Florida State(shouldn't even be in the discussion at all, literally not a top 10 team)

4. Alabama(they can't help themselves)

Texas lost their QB? I think you have them confused with FSU. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HardcoreHokie Mentor

HardcoreHokie

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The best teams are:

1. Washington

2. Oregon

3. Alabama 

4. Georgia 

5. Michigan

6. Texas(if they still had their QB they would be higher)

7. Ohio St.

After that it's a decent sized pool of relatively evenly matched teams.

 

The committee will have:

1. Michigan 

2. Washington

3. Florida State(shouldn't even be in the discussion at all, literally not a top 10 team)

4. Alabama(they can't help themselves)

Subjective “Best” is not who should make the final four.  Oregon has two losses when there are multiple undefeateds.

Undefeated Michigan out of the Top-4 is lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
Just now, HardcoreHokie said:

Subjective “Best” is not who should make the final four.  Oregon has two losses when there are multiple undefeateds.

Undefeated Michigan out of the Top-4 is lol.

I have said the entire year the Big Ten is a complete joke. I stand by that. It is only eclipsed by mid-G5 level ACC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinbrak Grand Master

cookinbrak

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

You might be right.  On the other hand, the backup qb who played against Florida and was starting to play well towards the end of the game might be the next Joe Montana, who is just starting to figure things out.  We don't know until they actually play.  

And he will be back for the playoff game.

FBS playoffs are a joke. 4 teams? FCS has a 24 team playoff every year and they survive.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HardcoreHokie Mentor

HardcoreHokie

Posted
Posted
Just now, kungfoodude said:

I have said the entire year the Big Ten is a complete joke. I stand by that. It is only eclipsed by mid-G5 level ACC.

FSU beat Florida and LSU (with Heisman favorite Jayden Daniels) and is undefeated.

Alabama needed a Hail Mary last week to beat 6-6 Auburn.  

Auburn lost the week before to New Mexico State.  At home.  By three touchdowns.

SEC baby.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...