Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nicole Tepper


Pazhoosier89
 Share

Recommended Posts

Any of y’all married peeps ever have your wife refuse to get off your back about an issue for over a week? Yes, of course you have. It always starts with a ‘hey babe’ or a ‘hey hun.’

Hey hun, I really think Brian is going to flourish in the 3-4. We really have to keep him. When are you meeting with the coaches and Fit again? I really think you should bring it up. 

Yup. It’s a wrap.

Wives heavily influence decisions on issues that they choose to take part of. How many ‘no way’ replies to her suggestions do you think he gets until his life is total hell? 

It’s not like bad team decisions are losing them any money in this. Owning pro sports teams are a hobby for them more than anything else. When they can put a winning team together I may change my mind.  
 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TN05 said:

Yeah, this is the problem right here. It's the peak of narcissism to try and give your wife - someone who, apparently, has no experience in any sort of executive environment, let alone a football one - a major role in the organization.

What she got down under must be damn good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ickmule said:
8 hours ago, TN05 said:

Yeah, this is the problem right here. It's the peak of narcissism to try and give your wife - someone who, apparently, has no experience in any sort of executive environment, let alone a football one - a major role in the organization.

What she got down under must be damn good. 

How would you describe it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't want to wade into this thread because I knew the sexism would be over the top.  Yep, I was right.

For those of you that don't know how to be critical without being a pig: Nicole Tepper has no notable experience in football therefore having her involved as a football decision maker is not a great look for the team.  Her working in the PR and community facing operations is great since that seems to be the role she's played before.

I have no problem critiquing her qualifications and experience - the results open it all for examination.  Asking what she adds to any football evaluation is really fair.  No problems there!

Sexist: Nicole Tepper is using her sexuality and femineity to influence the Panthers.  Many of y'all have been much more crass about that point, and it's just gross.  Some of y'all act like you have never felt the touch of a woman, that all women are objects designed for pleasing YOU.  It's super gross.  Talking about her having sexual relations with players, the quality of her sex acts, her general appearance...  You sound like 7th graders who found the national geographic with boobs in it that feel behind the book shelf in 1989.

Edited by d-dave
context
  • Pie 5
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2023 at 4:35 PM, Mr. Scot said:

There is a part of me that wonders whether Frank letting everyone know about the weekly meetings played a part in his firing.

It certainly has drawn a lot of negative press.

Oh I wouldn’t doubt it. Matt revealed the same thing a few weeks before he was fired I think, or maybe the year before- I can’t remember. 
 

I kinda felt like Reich dropped a lot of passive aggressive jabs in his pressers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Tone deaf.  My God this is insanity 

To be fair, she might not know anything about the story that's come out today.

I'd be willing to bet a years salary Dave does though, and he's probably fuming about it.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is huge may not be a trap game but this plays a major part in what they want to do. If we can get some pressure on Sam we know what he does with pressure coming hit and heavy. Also we may be able to take the top off their defense a backup safety trying to stop TMac or Cooker over the top or forcing him to play the backend should allow us to run the ball somewhat effectively. Either they allow some runs or we take some shots and if Bryce and whoever can connect deep we’ll be in business for another big time win against a top notch opponent. Might not be a trap game but health travel game plans all play a major role in each weeks game plan and this week might be leaving our way. We’re missing some replaceable pieces they’re missing key anchors to the offense and defense major difference time to solidly ourselves at one of the top teams in the nfc tomorrow fellas buckle up.
    • Yes.  If I am not mistaken, we need to sign Coker to the ERFA tender and insist that XL spends his spring and summer at a WR camp and not Coon huntin on his four wheeler.  XL was raw when we picked him--which is why I wanted to go another direction--and we are seeing how raw.  He is basically learning a position.     The Panthers will make their move in 2026 to be an NFL powerhouse behind Bryce.  Bryce needs intelligent WRs who catch the ball.  That said, we need a solid #2 to challenge XL and make cutting him easy, if necessary.  A #2 WR (intented to be a #1 by now) with under 400 yards is embarrassing.   On offense, you have to ask, "Where can we get better?"  In my view, #2 WR, TE (although they are improving) and maybe C (again, if we re-sign Mays, he is trending up and at 26, entering his prime--I say stay with him and find competition later in the draft (not good for C).  OL depth maybe?  In other words, XL is a glaring weak spot.    
×
×
  • Create New...