Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if....


Dingo_ate_Babies
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Dalton couldn’t even win on last years saints team that had more talent 

I know but the with most fans on this forum is they based every thing on Ginger's ONLY performance against a bad defensive team and that's how it would be for the entire season. These poster are INCAPABLE of viewing the forrest between the trees which is why they create all these new post on how bad Bryce is without any mention on not having any true playmakers and that DJ was insignificant which is why he is never mentioned while all the blame goes to my Bryce. And the bias mod who hid my post for no reason on my suggestion to let Andy go and pick up PJ Walker going forward while allowing all these hate post on Bryce to show up is NOT fit to be mod! 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Dalton couldn’t even win on last years saints team that had more talent 

And the worst post ever created was suggesting trading for Justin Fields cause he finally looks good in his 3rd season because their GM FINALLY gave him a true playmaker thanks to us and thinking he can do the same here without that same playmaker. Can you see the irony?

https://www.sportsmockery.com/chicago-bears/the-most-damning-justin-fields-fact-no-one-mentions-showed-up-again/

Been saying all season long that DJ was our most important offensive player and trading him was the biggest mistake when the trade went down way before the draft.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carter + Dalton + Horn and Wilks: 8 wins, a lot of them being defensive domination and leading the league in rushing… if Tepper allows us to run the ball like we did last season, this would be a really difficult offense to defend. Our line would be a top 10 unit. Icky would be back to pancaking fools again.  Dalton would be our ‘good enough’ qb. He would make plays when they needed to be made. Our scoring average would be about 24 points a game.  It would be a COMPLETELY different team. It would honestly be a team missing just a few pieces. 

Instead we have a coach killer HS kid who can’t win even when his team rushes for > 200 yards, a defense that is playing lights out, and go routes open all day. He’s smaller than most kickers for God’s sake. 

 I’m rewatching this trash right now. First drive of the game. Mingo running down the sideline open. Nope. Next play, same play. Sullivan (baller in the making) has his guy beat. Nope. It wouldn’t have even taken an elite throw to connect on either one. 

If Dalton starts the season, Frank still has a job. If Stroud is our guy, Frank still has a job. Bryce is about to get the whole damn coaching staff fired (not that they’re any good, anyway). He’s got team mates playing for their second contract, and they look like complete bums because of him. Thanks for the pay hit, Bryce. That’s their bank account. the sideline looks like they’re at… a…funeral. Theirs. 

 I’m all about ‘building a team around Bryce.’ All that essentially means is filling out the line with  all pros and scooping up a couple 6’1” 4.3 receivers that have a 10 foot catch radius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

I expect a 15 year vet to be better than a rookie, doesn’t mean much we would still suck with Dalton.

Not to be that much better than a #1 pick QB, it's not like he is competing against a 3rd round project. Especially for a 15 year vet who is a shadow of his old self. 

Making the football bearable to watch would be a fun thing to try again this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

These people are getting paid millions of dollars to suck at their job... I won't shed a single tear for them while most of us have to bust our ass off just to survive

You don't think there's people working jobs directly related to the Panthers success that don't make much money? Concession workers, support staff, eetc. There's 1000s of jobs that are directly and indirectly tied to an NFL franchise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, App Panther said:

You don't think there's people working jobs directly related to the Panthers success that don't make much money? Concession workers, support staff, eetc. There's 1000s of jobs that are directly and indirectly tied to an NFL franchise. 

When I refer to these people, I'm talking about our actual players and front office staff. Obviously people working concessions, maintenance, ushers, etc are not included in that statement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Waldo said:

Not to be that much better than a #1 pick QB, it's not like he is competing against a 3rd round project. Especially for a 15 year vet who is a shadow of his old self. 

Making the football bearable to watch would be a fun thing to try again this year. 

He’s not that much better, that Seahawks game wasn’t even competitive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Who’s our backup then? Dalton isn’t making it through the whole season getting abused at his age. 

Keep Corral and if he sucked we'd have our 1st round pick to take a qb this coming draft. We have nothing to look forward to unless the people upstairs accept Bryce is a bust and they take a qb in the 2nd or 3rd to compete with Dalton and Bryce

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...