Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official boycott next week’s game


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

You do realize the PSLs are already sold, right? Whether or not butts are in seats is inconsequential- the tickets are sold and the money is in the bank.

PSLs account for over 90% of the tickets at BOA.

Well, it does hurt the concession sales.

Doesn't really hurt Tepper much (if at all), but the guys who sell food and other items do struggle.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah atm the biggest hit would be to make the businesses that are involved with the Panthers not want to be involved... but I said a long while back to stay away (who wanted to waste time and more money to watch this soul crushing embarrassing team/organization anyhow?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

You do realize the PSLs are already sold, right? Whether or not butts are in seats is inconsequential- the tickets are sold and the money is in the bank.

PSLs account for over 90% of the tickets at BOA.

Oh yeah. I used to have PSLs and sold them because Tepper….use that money for Canes season Tix now…. But optics are perception and perception is reality. Empty stands will send a message to sponsors and TV revenue.  Also, concessions are a major piece of that revenue….if no one shows up…that’s how you send a message. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Well, it does hurt the concession sales.

Doesn't really hurt Tepper much (if at all), but the guys who sell food and other items do struggle.  

 

1 hour ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Also, concessions are a major piece of that revenue….if no one shows up…that’s how you send a message. 

Charities, booster groups and other organizations operate a large portion of the concessions on game day and a portion of the profits go to them, so there's that part of it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...