Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With Panthers cleaning house how safe is Bryce


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

How many of you would want to accept a job under the following conditions?

Everyone was basically let go for poor performance. Oh one small thing, there is a guy your boss wants to keep. This is a key position to your success . This employee has greatly under performed and isn’t necessarily your pick. Remember your job is to be successful but you have to use this one guy. Add in the last two people at your position was fired pretty quickly for lack of progress.
 

None of you would do that. You’d want to bring in who you think is best fitted for your style to succeed.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carolina Mike said:

How many of you would want to accept a job under the following conditions?

Everyone was basically let go for poor performance. Oh one small thing, there is a guy your boss wants to keep. This is a key position to your success . This employee has greatly under performed and isn’t necessarily your pick. Remember your job is to be successful but you have to use this one guy. Add in the last two people at your position was fired pretty quickly for lack of progress.
 

None of you would do that. You’d want to bring in who you think is best fitted for your style to succeed.

I fully agree. No new GM/HC pair is gonna hitch themselves to what was on film last season without a contingency.  Wouldn't be suprised if we make a late or mid-round pick for a qb.  Especially one that fits the style of the new HC.  Can always cover your tracks by saying you need to have multiple qbs that can play and point to the Browns situation to back up your claims.  From there you can start your contingency plan and look to the future if things get even worse.  Scapegoat is already fired no need to have to answer for the trade-up or whatever have you.

Best case scenario is that BY was truly the product of too many chef's in the kitchen and a scheme that didn't play to your strengths and he hits the potential that many believe he had pre-draft.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What new HC and GM would want to wear around their necks the very same albatross that dragged down their predecessors? 

The pay packages had better be unprecedented, along with other perks such as free use of private jets and luxury yachts for the next ten years regardless whether they remain employed by the Panthers organization, trust funds for two generations of offsprings, a minimum of 5% ownership shares in Appaloosa Management, severance packages north of $20 million on top of guaranteed contract money, lifetime memberships at country clubs of their choosing, etc.

Edited by BenjaminBreeg
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy Eddie Murphy GIF by Laff
 

This board is filled with ppl living in a bubble..

Reality check.. 

1. More than half the league had him as the number 1 QB coming out.. Meaning most of the ppl we are looking to hire thought he was the best QB in the draft..

 

2. Most of the league aren’t looking at this season as a BY issue.. The Panthers in many respected league analysts opinion were the problem not BY.. So it’s a good chance you will be able to find a coach that wanted to work with BY before this season and still does now.. 

 

3. Tepper will be more of a reason coaches and GM’s won’t come here before BY.. (Number 1 reason) imo

The Oline will be more of a reason coaches won’t come here then BY..

Having to rebuild the weapons around him will be a bigger reason ppl might say no then BY..

Ppl need to just prepare themselves for this reality..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Gipetto said:

You don't give up on a first overall pick after 1 season. Are y'all dumb

I mean i think its you who might be dumb. This type of stuff happens often, qb drafted high, old regime fired, new regime comes in and doesnt like prior qb, and benches him. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Arguing about who had what and who did what with more is just going to end in the same charades. If we're going to waste a lot of hot air arguing then make it about something that cannot be denied. What you are seeing with your own two eyes. Cam Newton was a tremendously talented athlete albeit flawed in fundamental aspects. And although he played poorly in and lost a Super Bowl you cannot deny him that more often than not through his prime his teammates knew they could count on him to hold up his end of the bargain usually and be a key driving force for keeping them in games. Giving his defense much needed rest and motivation in wanting to match his grit as a competitor. That aspect is just not there with Bryce Young. Yeah he's dumped on the Falcons in a dome twice but what about his other 44 games? When has the Panthers defense the last three years ever looked at their starting quarterback and thought to themselves "man I'm so glad he's my QB"?
    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
×
×
  • Create New...