Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Wildcard Weekend - Games Thread

Bear Hands

By Bear Hands,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

feel bad for the Lions and their fans if they blow this, but the Rams have been fuging hot lately and still have many core pieces of a recent SB winner so they shouldn’t have any shame losing despite it being at home and the difference in record 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Some folks are saying (I’ve heard it from my friends) that they weren’t gonna watch the peacock game, just out of principle.

while I agree in spirit, the microtransactions/subbing to another terrible streaming service just to watch one NFL game, is capitalistic greed and wrong - it’s gonna be the norm eventually. People will subscribe and pay to watch.  

Yea I agree. If I was still watching the NFL like 10 years ago or in the states, Id pirate the hell out of them. I believe capitalistic is one of the best ways, BUT me myself are a terrible one. Id do not over consume, I buy stuff at thift stores/marketplace, do not care about fashion fads etc, nor eat out much. Honestly nearly got everything I need, which is why I know the NFL doesnt care one bit about my lack of fandom. I do miss spending the winning cash and talking trash form the FF stuff, I will admit that. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted

NFL wants Detroit to win so badly. This entire game has been about Detroit.

 

That was a clear pass interference no call.

 

Congrats Eminem and Detroit. You win your first playoff game in decades. You're going home next week enjoy it. Stafford was the best QB in the NFC.  Such a shame they forced Goff down our throats.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...