Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Wildcard Weekend - Games Thread


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Shocker said:

Haha…it is 1 game.  Jeez…very weird 

Baker isn't a plus starter but he probably has at least a dozen games better than Bryce's best.

What's very weird is you still stumping for Bryce and acting like he's not terrible. Yes, the Panthers are terrible. But yes, Bryce is also terrible. What sucks the most about that is that he doesn't have the traits to improve much on that. It's one thing if a talented young player struggles with the transition. But Bryce was supposed to have all those mental abilities and intangibles. The critique of Bryce was always that he might be as good as he's gonna get already. Uh oh.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

Back to topic, something is going on in Philly for the past month that will be interesting to see when it comes to light.

The luck ran out. They were frauds. I pointed this out in November.  They weren't really playing all that well. They were getting lucky as hell and snatching victory from the jaws of defeat over and over again.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

You called it.

 

Don't worry though BB will fix that defense in no time. It would be foolish for them not to go hard after BB.

BB and the Cowboys feels like destiny. Either way, he will likely have options that include really good teams and you know he wants to pass Brady for SB wins probably more than anything else in life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick Sirianni is a Frank Reich guy. Reading all the stories today about dysfunction between Jalen Hurts, Sirianni and the O.C. Brian Johnson regarding the direction the Eagles offense seems eerily similar to what our offense experienced this season.

Makes you wonder if the apple perhaps doesn't fall far from the tree.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...