Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs Divisional Round - Games Thread


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lamar the FA QB no team wanted. Not a bad performance.

Bruh, he wasn't a FA. He was franchise tagged. Teams realized they would've been doing nothing but negotiating the terms for the Ravens since all the Ravens would've had to have done was simply take any offer Lamar singed and said, "Yep, we'll do that." and ink the deal. Just stop.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

The team that has the most heat for not “pursing” Lamar is Atlanta but again, he was never leaving Baltimore.

No contract offer was even made. You can't say this as a fact. We will never know if he was truly available or not because all the owners came together and said know.

 

Lamar ended up not getting the fully guaranteed Watson contract so of course the Ravens won as that did not happen as the owners wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You're so off base. Kelce has a couple of more productive seasons in the tank. This is the playoffs. Mahomes and Reid will play to their strengths. Chiefs win!

The Chiefs very well might win. But Kelce is 34 years old and he's starting to look like a shadow of what he once was. Father Time is a cruel bastard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...