Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Last 3 Drafts We Had 22 Total Selections...


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guess how many of those players turned into pro bowlers or blue chip starters??

 

Zero.

 

I count about 3 players who are decent.

Tremble, Hubbard, and Brady Christensen.  Horn has been hurt too much to put him in that group. Brady Christensen is teetering because he's had 2 seasons of getting injured.

 

2022 and 2023 drafts have 0 impact starters.

We been talking about head coaches so much I think the gm hire is a lot more important. Even looking further down our franchises draft history we have a tendency to miss on the majority of our picks no matter the year.

 

 

Screenshot_20240122_105615_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240122_105521_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240122_105501_Chrome.jpg

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Those are all horrible. How can Tepper keep anyone in management and scouting that assembled these? Pathetic. 

This is what would scare me about retaining Dan Morgan and promoting him to GM. I have no idea how much influence he had on these drafts. But I literally saw him whispering into Scott Fitterers ears during those draft videos lol. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

This is what would scare me about retaining Dan Morgan and promoting him to GM. I have no idea how much influence he had on these drafts. But I literally saw him whispering into Scott Fitterers ears during those draft videos lol. 

I believe Scott really lead the college/draft side while Morgan specialized in existing FA but I still get your concerns 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

One of the main reasons Scott Fitterer deservingly got fired was repeatedly trading up for bad players. He was an atrocious GM and I am very happy he is no longer working for the Panthers. Legendarily horrible to be perfectly honest. 

He is the worst GM in team history. It’s not up for debate. He wrecked the panthers badly. Poor trades, god awful draft picks, signing players like inches Sanders. The team got better once he was fired. 
 

It’s amazing to me that the entire scouting department and management associated with ShitFitt and the abomination the panthers have put on the field the past 3 years aren’t all unemployed. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

He is the worst GM in team history. It’s not up for debate. He wrecked the panthers badly. Poor trades, god awful draft picks, signing players like inches Sanders. The team got better once he was fired. 
 

It’s amazing to me that the entire scouting department and management associated with ShitFitt and the abomination the panthers have put on the field the past 3 years aren’t all unemployed. 

What's even worse is he was bad from the moment he walked through the door. The decisions during the 2021 offseason were horrendous. We don't know how much was Rhule or how much was him, but still. He didn't have really any success. Signing Frankie Luvu? I guess? 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, BC isn't in that first group. He is a backup that gets unjured too often. So just Tremble and Hubbard.

I don't know what has been worse between the player evaluations and the team building. There is no cohesive meshing on the team building side with their personnel and the player evaluations have been trash. That explains how you end up with a bust that is Young as the rotten cherry on top.

Keeping anyone from last year is a hard fail.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...