Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan named GM/President


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Is there anyone that knows anything about football really think Dan Morgan can build an NFL roster?  If so, what track record says he can do anything here?

Tepper wants control and he is the worst owner in sports including Jordan and that shet is amazingly bad

John Lynch. Former players can be GMs. Just like they can be HCs. Bryce Young sucks.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

 

I hope he is more Beane than Fitterer, but the lack of improvement of defensive personnel over the past 3 seasons doesn't speak well of him being like Beane. Too many misses at LB & leadership for me just as a starting point in the evaluation of Dan Morgan the executive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zod said:

Then you don't know Dan.

 

I know Dan and he is far from a yes man.

 

He is also one of the most competitive people that has ever walked in the stadium.

 

I hope it works out for him

I'll take your word for it. I wasn't crazy about the hire, but you know him and I don't. I hope you're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I bring the best out of people. Had to crack your shell. You do a lot of pooing with no responding. Glad to see you finally break that shell.

 

I'm hoping Morgan is the best GM possible. Just can't put faith into Tepper that's all.

I respond all the time. I mean you referenced a response of mine. Once someone has proven to be a brick wall, I stop banging my head against it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

I hope he is more Beane than Fitterer, but the lack of improvement of defensive personnel over the past 3 seasons doesn't speak well of him being like Beane. Too many misses at LB & leadership for me just as a starting point in the evaluation of Dan Morgan the executive.

You can bring the data and opinions to the boss but what Scott did was on him, Dan has never been in the position to make the final call till now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...