Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales Hire Temperature Gauge


Ricky Spanish
 Share

How do you feel about the Canales Hire?  

370 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you feel about the Canales Hire?

    • Love it!
      120
    • Hate it!
      28
    • Indifferent
      220


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

So he changed.  That's promising.  Maybe he will keep changing/adapting?

The  "change" I want to see from Tepper is him butting his ass out 

Canales doesn't really strike me as having the leverage to do that unless Morgan backs him.

We'll have to see if that happens.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The  "change" I want to see from Tepper is him butting his ass out 

Canales doesn't really strike me as having the leverage to do that unless Morgan backs him.

We'll have to see if that happens.

Dan Morgan will stop Tepper from crossing the LOS. It’s his specialty. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Dan Morgan will stop Tepper from crossing the LOS. It’s his specialty. 

I genuinely hope so.

Mind you, Dan will still have to prove he knows what he's doing too.

What scares me is I remember him advocating for the Panthers to sign Michael Vick back in the day.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I genuinely hope so.

Mind you, Dan will still have to prove he knows what he's doing too.

What scares me is I remember him advocating for the Panthers to sign Michael Vick back in the day.

He did well on the Eagles.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

Glad we have a coach with  potential  at this point.

Let's get to work.

The Morgan hire is more the issue right now.

Why is Morgan the bigger issue? Experience? He and Canales worked together for years in Seattle. This hire was Morgan-led, so if your mindset is that Morgan is a puppet for Tepper ... so is Canales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading through this thread looks exactly like it did when we hired Rhule due to his youth, and then again when we hired Reich due to his experience. This guy will also poo the bed and I imagine the thread when he gets fired (O/U is at 25 games and I’ll take the under) will also look just like the Rhule/Reich fired threads. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Montsta said:

Reading through this thread looks exactly like it did when we hired Rhule due to his youth, and then again when we hired Reich due to his experience. This guy will also poo the bed and I imagine the thread when he gets fired (O/U is at 25 games and I’ll take the under) will also look just like the Rhule/Reich fired threads. 

Sadly it doesn't matter if we lose  every game this dude is likely our HC for the next 2 years at least.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

Morgan got his guy. Perhaps we should all rejoice. 

We can at least fool ourselves into thinking that Morgan told Tepper--who we all know wanted Johnson--to effectively "put a sock in it."

yeah this is a good sign that Morgan is running the show. Not the biggest fan of keeping him considering how bad the team he's had a large hand in building has been but at least we likely finally have a HC hired by a GM so they are both on the same page and have the same vision of the team. The Hurney/Rhule/Fitterer/Reich situations were all so completely out of sync.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...