Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tabor Out


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, frankw said:

He seemed like a good guy good luck to him. But I'm glad we are letting our new head coach build his staff. Anyone not named Evero.. ✌️

well, and Evero's staff.  Evero was a good Coord, but also his assistants at all levels did a good job.  I would keep that cohesion together for defensive stability.  The offense and special teams should be completely uprooted.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The "Hunger Games" story might have done him in.

Fired on the same day:

HC Frank Reich

QB Coach Josh McCown

RB Coach Duce Staley


Promoted to HC that same day:

ST Coach Chris Tabor

 

Later fired:

GM Scott Fitterer


Later hired:

GM Dan Morgan

HC Dave Canales

 

Then fired: 

Chris Tabor (does this count as Tepper’s 5th HC firing in 5 years?)

Was Tabor the one texting Tepper?

I really really want to hear some of these guys interviewed about what happened.  Definite Hunger Games environment.  There’s a reason none (McCown, Duce especially) have not spoken out (NDA).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WestPanthers said:

Not sure is Dan Morgan decision or Dave decision.....

So we from Rock star coaching staff to All star coaching staff and then what's next?

The No Name staff. Also know as, "Who are these guys?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WestPanthers said:

Not sure is Dan Morgan decision or Dave decision.....

So we from Rock star coaching staff to All star coaching staff and then what's next?

Canales likely (hopefully) will bring in  a staff as is the usual model.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...