Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers new offensive philosophy


jamos14
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, broncoitis said:

Do we cut loose our swiss army knife Shenault?  Has been available for more than 6 games any either season he's been here?

He's a FA but I would approve of bringing him back.  I thought he was very underutilized even when he was healthy.

 

 

Edited by jamos14
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, broncoitis said:

Do we cut loose our swiss army knife Shenault?  Has been available for more than 6 games any either season he's been here?

He had shown he can make plays but he's a bit like a lesser Curtis Samuel. Can be good except he can't stay on the field. 

Expendable if we can find guys like him in the draft. Rookies much more likely to have upside or at least match his production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how is this "new" offensive philosophy any different from what wilks was doing after rhule?

it's still frustrating to think how much farther things would be right now if they had just built on what was established under wilks, even if he wasn't going to be the coach.

i'm confident bryce young wouldn't look like the hot trash he looks like now if he had that from day one. it was the perfect environment for a rookie qb. he may not have looked all world, but he would at least look serviceable.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
    • Crosby will garner a haul in a trade. I would be reluctant to make that trade because of the following: 1. Our overall roster is awful. We cannot afford to be trading away valuable draft capital. 2. He isn't the best fit(IMO) for the scheme that Evero runs.  I love the player but it would really need to be at a reasonable deal and I think he is likely to garner an unreasonable price if he gets traded.
    • In terms of need, EDGE is currently #1. Our pass rush is near league worst levels. However, I don't subscribe to "need" based drafting. BPA all day.  We do need to dramatically upgrade over Scourton, Jones, Wonnum and Umanmielen. That is likely in the running for the NFL's worst two deep. Not saying all those players are bad, but I am saying 100% of those players are 2nd or 3rd stringers.
×
×
  • Create New...