Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales and Morgan at the combine


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Maybe I dont understand how these things work, but this strikes me as odd.  Wouldnt working with burns people to get a deal done be priority a,b and c since the season ended?

I dont think so.  If he wont budge on the whole 30m per thing then there isnt much to talk about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Didn't watch just going off tweets. Dunno if I can stomach a full Panthers press conference anymore

I watched them for you. Dave came off as a lamb being lead to slaughter while dropping coach speak quotes. Dan looked off the meth and said what every single GM says - " want tough, smart, guys that are all football". Each feel WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYY over their heads about the rebuild ahead. More I see about caralas, the less I like the hire. I hated the rhule hire, its not that bad, but right now Id want evero leading this rebuild rather than a guy seahawks never gave a OC job too after 14 years there..... ALLL while he was "loved" by pete and staff......like what is that poo??? Only the panthers gave him a call to interview for HC and thats with carales qualifying for the rooney diversity hire. 

I was thinking about win/lost over/under and this made me put the number at 3.5. *bonus- i think smart money is the under*

Dan has to draft like the best GM in NFL history the next three years(missing a 2nd next....) and canalas needs to figure out how to be a NFL HC while being one. Just feels like this will get feel ugly fast, just my honest feel right now. 

 

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

I watched them for you. Dave came off as a lamb being lead to slaughter while dropping coach speak quotes. Dan looked off the meth and said what every single GM says - " want tough, smart, guys that are all football". Each feel WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYY over their heads about the rebuild ahead. More I see about caralas, the less I like the hire. I hated the rhule hire, its not that bad, but right now Id want evero leading this rebuild rather than a guy seahawks never gave a OC job too after 14 years there..... ALLL while he was "loved" by pete and staff......like what is that poo??? Only the panthers gave him a call to interview for HC and thats with carales qualifying for the rooney diversity hire. 

I was thinking to put the win/lost over/under and this made me put the number at 3.5. *bonus- i think smart money is the under*

Dan has to draft like the best GM in NFL history the next three years(missing a 2nd next....) and canalas needs to figure out how to be a NFL HC while being one. Just feels like this will get feel ugly fast, just my honestly feel right now. 

 

Plus Canales wants to call plays on top of learning on the job...His head is already spinning and he hasn't even had a practice yet. And he was pretty honest about it, and about the fact that he couldn't afford to turn the job down, "betting on himself" and whatever. Saw that money and said sure I can fix Bryce! lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Plus Canales wants to call plays on top of learning on the job...His head is already spinning and he hasn't even had a practice yet. And he was pretty honest about it, and about the fact that he couldn't afford to turn the job down, "betting on himself" and whatever. Saw that money and said sure I can fix Bryce! lol

Yea, it has a bad feel about it. I get it, once you look at the roster, watch the tape, know the investment they have in young.....its a lose/lose deal. If morgan and caralass pull it off within three years, build a fuging heavens tall statue of each next to sam mills. 

I dont blame him one bit, take that 6 year multi-million lotto ticket. I just dont see him being able to over-come the least talented roster, no depth, no young talent, few great picks, and you are forced to play young with the hope hes turns into a NFL QB...... This job will take years off his life....dave better find him one of these fast-

Lorraine Bracco sitting in a chair in The Sopranos

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CRA said:

well, I don't walk away from that talk/plan of action thinking that our new HC believes Bryce Young was a #1 overall give up the farm type QB.   

Any HC in 2024 that is putting his emphasis on running the rock and seeing what happens imo doesn't believe they drafted  someone that has "it".  

 

I wouldn't read too much into it. We've been saying since last year got that we have to get some semblance of a run game and play action going for Bryce to have a chance. Tepper ran Reich out of town over it. I could have told you that was going to be the next coach's philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...