Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns Franchise Tagged


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would 100% trade him for a first round pick if that were available.

If he was good against the run, then that's an easy player to keep as your cornerstone. But he just isn't. He's a one way, situational player and just isn't worth the 30+ million a year. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

No amount of hype can overcome his tape. That's the bottom line. 

But his tape isn't terrible. Some of you seem to be acting like he's some scrub that will be without suitors. He's a two-time Pro-Bowler with good production. Paired with another premier pass rusher and he could be the difference between winning and not. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, KSpan said:

People are dumb and reactionary, but Burns has been the exact same player since he came in. 5 years of the exact same film doesn't lie. Again, I'm not in the 'Burns sucks' camp, but rather the 'Burns isn't worth elite money' camp. He is clearly a quality player, just not a game-changer.

Exactly. He’s a role player like Reddick was. He doesn’t have that ‘dog’ Morgan likes. Even the 28 mil the Panthers offered him was extremely gracious. And that is exactly why a deal hasn’t been worked out yet. Even Fitt knew better. This is a huge test for Morgan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

You cannot keep this secret. You cannot tell me agents and teammates do not talk about this to friends on other teams. Anyone in any FO have already heard what's up through the grapevine. Any team interested already knows what they are willing to pay him and what they are willing to give up to do so. The Panthers have no bargaining power unless they get more than one suitor. You know that no team is giving up that much capital for Brian Burns. No amount of hype can overcome his tape. That's the bottom line. 

It's possible it's still amateur hour.   I don't deny that.   I still think he'll be traded before the draft for a reasonable return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

But his tape isn't terrible. Some of you seem to be acting like he's some scrub that will be without suitors. He's a two-time Pro-Bowler with good production. Paired with another premier pass rusher and he could be the difference between winning and not. 

He's not earning his current paycheck and is not willing to put in the effort to get a raise. Does that sound like someone you build a defense around?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

He's not earning his current paycheck and is not willing to put in the effort to get a raise. Does that sound like someone you build a defense around?

Those are strong words. It's an opinion. I don't think Burns lacks effort. He has arguably earned his paycheck, and he deserves a raise. The problem is that he wants to hold us over a barrel. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

Those are strong words. It's an opinion. I don't think Burns lacks effort. He has arguably earned his paycheck, and he deserves a raise. The problem is that he wants to hold us over a barrel. 

He has gotten a raise 2 seasons in a row, he played on his 5th year option at 16m and now is on the tag at 24m.

If he wanted a big payday he should have had a monster season last year, he didnt and now his contract will be adjusted accordingly. 

Spotrac has his value at 21m per.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he'd take 21 then bring it. But if he wants Bosa money, GTFO. You can't begin rebuild with misallocating MORE resources. 8-10 mil is the difference in another fantastic player. Overpays handcuff you and send a signal to other FAs that Carolina is a money mark organization. We'll get guys th are looking for a bag and then lay up like bums and produce nothing. Jacksonville had that rep for years. 

Edited by Panthero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, top dawg said:

But his tape isn't terrible. Some of you seem to be acting like he's some scrub that will be without suitors. He's a two-time Pro-Bowler with good production. Paired with another premier pass rusher and he could be the difference between winning and not. 

Go watch the tb game from 2022.  Biggest game of his career was perhaps his worst 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, top dawg said:

Those are strong words. It's an opinion. I don't think Burns lacks effort. He has arguably earned his paycheck, and he deserves a raise. The problem is that he wants to hold us over a barrel. 

It's a fact. Burns is so overrated here it's comical. I think his fans should pay more attention to him when he's in the game before they carry his water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made it a point this past season to watch Burns on every play. He did the same thing every pass play. Would just try to beat the offensive lineman with speed and run right behind the QB. The only time he gets sacks is when the DT gets pressure up the middle and the QB has to step back to avoid the pressure. He has no inside moves or bull rush at all. Then of course he’s a liability on run plays. Every offense made it a point to run towards his side. Was embarrassing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

It's a fact. Burns is so overrated here it's comical. I think his fans should pay more attention to him when he's in the game before they carry his water.

Burns is a two-time Pro-Bowler and has been productive relative to his pay just like many good young players in the league, and likewise hasn't even hit his prime. Furthermore, he's had to play in several systems under not so good circumstances. In 2023, like this metric or not, Burns did not get the opportunities to do what he does best, as we didn't have any leads in the fourth quarter and weren't in a position to pin our ears back and go get the passer. Despite a down 2023, any NFL type will tell you that Burns would be a nice piece to have. The biggest problem with Burns is not that he's overrated, (even here on the Huddle), but that he wants to be overpaid. He isn't a superstar but wants to be paid like one. That's a huge problem. He thinks he's worth more than his play has indicated. Those are the facts.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That can be a chicken or the egg scenario. Canales knows what the QB is good at and is not good at better than we do.  He would have reasons for not calling deep shots, if he is holding back. They could include protection concerns, as well as any Young related motivations.  I think there always the chance Bryce doesn’t see the man open down the field and it is just that simple, more than a confidence issue. Probably a mix of the two.   
    • This is a partially bad take.  Willis is the only guy mentioned here that can reasonably be expected to perform at a level higher than Bryce.  Winston and Minshew is washed, and Howell was not good in Washington as a starter and didn’t field a single snap this past year. I swear the only reason people are obsessed over him is that he went to UNC.  You’re not going to have better success, or even potential for success with those guys as your QB as you would with Bryce. Now, if you want to argue this thing from a production per dollars perspective, that it’d be better to roll with one of them instead because we could allocate the savings elsewhere on the roster, that’d be a better argument IMO. I’d disagree with it; relying on a QB making less they $5MM/year that isn’t on a rookie contract is not a winning strategy.  But I could see the argument that it’s possibly a viable alternative to Bryce on a $25MM/year contract.    But no, none of those QBs are better than Bryce. 
    • No team hits on every pick.  Every coach and GM will eventually get fired.   We are a better team and have greatly increased the talent on the roster. Bad GMs lead to losses.   I love the teams current setup in the front office and the process in how we look at talent and coaching.  Canales has often said we want to have a player developmental philosophy as a core tenant.  I love that combined with cutting edge analytics and good football knowledge and experience.
×
×
  • Create New...