Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan is a legend and I trust him


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

if he doesn't think Burns or any of these dudes were worth keeping I trust him. And I love the investment into the interior oline. Even if Bryce doesn't work out that is something that will benefit any QB or offense. 
 

yall ready to burn poo down but give Dan and Dave Canales a chance man. 

We now have $33M in cap space including the cuts previously mentioned and signings - with restructures and other cuts we could be around $40-45 left to spend this year.  Now yall tell me given what we have right now, if we signed Ridley, KJ Osborn, a few more FA hole fillers, draft Chop Robinson & Ja'Tavion Sanders with those 2nd round picks people can't see a future?

I'm not saying we are winning the Division, but so far I am good with out position - going into the draft we are better than we were last week IMO.  I'm with ya Frank

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

if he doesn't think Burns or any of these dudes were worth keeping I trust him. And I love the investment into the interior oline. Even if Bryce doesn't work out that is something that will benefit any QB or offense. 
 

yall ready to burn poo down but give Dan and Dave Canales a chance man. 

Morgan wanted to keep Burns and not deal him to the Rams for multiple first round picks.  Guys like Dan Morgan are why we are where we are today. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

And I love the investment into the interior oline. Even if Bryce doesn't work out that is something that will benefit any QB or offense.

This all day. A strong offensive line is something we've desperately needed for a decade, and it's something that will benefit any QB.

Cam, Bridgewater, Darnold, Baker, Bryce, they have all looked horrible because our offensive line has been warmed over dog poo since the Gross/Kalil days. Give your QB, ANY QB an opportunity to be successful. And whether it's Bryce, or a much better, taller, sturdier QB in the future (hypothetically) this will not be a wasted investment.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Morgan wanted to keep Burns and not deal him to the Rams for multiple first round picks.  Guys like Dan Morgan are why we are where we are today. 

Morgan didnt want to trade burns

Morgan thought dj johnson was a good pick

Morgan was pounding the table for ISM

Morgan thought jammie robinson was a good player

 

I have a feeling I know how this is going to end

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Morgan didnt want to trade burns

Morgan thought dj johnson was a good pick

Morgan was pounding the table for ISM

Morgan thought jammie robinson was a good player

 

I have a feeling I know how this is going to end


Yep. Zero evidence to think Morgan and Fitt were butting heads the past few years.

He was in on all these decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Morgan didnt want to trade burns

Morgan thought dj johnson was a good pick

Morgan was pounding the table for ISM

Morgan thought jammie robinson was a good player

 

I have a feeling I know how this is going to end

Morgan decided to keep Ian Thomas. 

I've seen enough, this is more of the same stinky crap. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 33inNC said:

Morgan decided to keep Ian Thomas. 

I've seen enough, this is more of the same stinky crap. 

He kept him at a salary of barely over 1 million a year.  Of all the reasons to question Morgan, this isn't one of them.

 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Literally watching ESPN First Take and Shannon Sharpe and he literally said we got dumb dumb people running the FO.

 

It's kind of sad how many people are starting to trash our franchise in the Nat'l media. Never thought we would ever be the laughing stock of the league, but we are officially that team.

 

Tepper buying the team was the worst thing that could ever happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

The trade to the Giants proves this wrong. 

I do think Morgan wanted to keep Burns at the time. Person reported that.  

 

But it was vastly different circumstances; we were still holding on to hope that we were a good team and didn't need a complete tear down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...