Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BOLD Prediction: Defense will be Better not Worse


WUnderhill
 Share

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, rayzor said:

if the offense is improved at all, that will also help out the D. 

i see us picking up a couple more vets in the next few days and in the draft we could probably pick up a couple more solid contributors. 

i think the quality guys we've gotten so far can be used as a good indication of what we might be able to expect in the draft. o think fitt was more looking at trying to find diamonds in the rough or guys who could be great if given another chance or whatever. i don't know. whatever it was that he was looking for, i think Morgan is looking at something else. probably benefitting more from being a player himself rather than fitt who was a desk jockey relying on input from other desk jockeys. 

Right, the maulers at OG will help the running game which helps the defense stayed rested.  If we can get a couple average pass rushers and a safety when have upgraded the defense IMO.  It's more complete.  Offense is already upgraded before the draft.  OL, and WR are better and we lost Hurst which doesn't really do much...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

The run defense is already better with Robinson and Jewell. Pass defense is the concern now.

it will get there. 

we get an edge rusher that gives a poo and we'll automatically be better. 

the problem there is that 2 of the three options are clowney and chase young. lazy don't care GIF

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

it will get there. 

we get an edge rusher that gives a poo and we'll automatically be better. 

the problem there is that 2 of the three options are clowney and chase young. lazy don't care GIF

Yeah, put the 2 together and you might get the production of an average edge. But that was all we had anyway so it's a start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if our defense is somehow better this year, it will only be because of 1 of 2 reasons: 

1) our offense improves significantly, which means way lose turnovers and a much higher TOP. We were god awful in both stats last year

2) we go defense heavy in the draft and the rookies ball out + Horn stays healthy and plays the entire year

Otherwise, I don't see the defense performing better this year than last year, which is ok. If the offense doesn't improve significantly, then we should be very worried

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Zero pass rush.  Until I see hiw they are addressing the pass rush, I just don't see it. Am a defensive guy. 

So many dismiss Burns impact on the defense.  

 

Here’s a fun exercise. Apologies in advance for the formatting, for some reason the copy/paste came in with this black background.

One of these guys is Brian Burns and cost $30m/yr. The other 3 are free agents that will cost significantly less. Where would you rather spend the money?
 

STATS

25 Tackles; 7.5 Sacks; 0 FF; 15.5% Pass Rush Win Rate; 64.6 Run-defense Grade


STATS

50 Tackles; 8 Sacks; 1 FF; 11.6% PRWR; 56.3 Run-D


STATS

62 Tackles; 8 Sacks; 0 FF; 8.2% PRWR; 65.7 Run-D


STATS

43 Tackles; 9.5 Sacks; 2 FF; 14.2% PRWR; 74.4 Run-D


And as an added bonus, here’s a free agent who has already signed with a different team for less than Brian Burns, and if this doesn’t tell you the Giants got hosed I don’t know what does:

STATS

83 Tackles; 16.5 Sacks; 4 FF; 15.8% PRWR; 61.5 Run-D
 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

We lost both Burns and Gross-Matos.

That wasn't a bad thing, IMO. One fizzled out as it came time to talk about money (I think he had itchy feet to get to somewhere else for the paychecks) and the other guy just never developed into anything but a back-up, not even a real role-player.

Luvu hurts, but like you said, he wasn't much help in coverage. It will be good to get Shaq back and he brings leadership and legacy there. He will make a difference. 

Losing Jackson, well, yeah. I think we're all on that page. And Bell was, umm, un-notable back there?

Yeah I forgot about YGM. Bell played 3/4 of the season and was solid if unspectacular at best. Low impact was my wording I believe. He graded as a bottom half of the league safety.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, rayzor said:

it will get there. 

we get an edge rusher that gives a poo and we'll automatically be better. 

the problem there is that 2 of the three options are clowney and chase young. lazy don't care GIF

I’d love to get Clowney, tbh. Yeah he’s a mercenary, but he can play either standing up or with his hand in the dirt, and is the definition of playing the run on the way to the QB. Always been a great run defender. Get him and a younger pass rush specialist like Wonnum for cheap, add Haynes coming back from injury, DJ Johnson for depth, maybe draft a guy, and I think that is a lot better than our Burns/YGM combo last year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hinges on if they can bring in a veteran like Clowney and if Horn can stay healthy. If so, then it could be a decent defense. If not, then we're going to exposed in the secondary and pass-rush. Having a great run defense won't matter if we can't defend the pass.

I'm interested to see if the Panthers can find a corner in the draft that can replace Jackson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Zero pass rush.  Until I see hiw they are addressing the pass rush, I just don't see it. Am a defensive guy. 

So many dismiss Burns impact on the defense.  

 

Burns dismissed his impact before any of us did..
 

all the talk of how good the players we let go do, and while I think Luvu & Chinn are gonna ball out in WAs, I’d put a paycheck on letting #0 walk was the correct move…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, j2sgam said:

Burns dismissed his impact before any of us did..
 

all the talk of how good the players we let go do, and while I think Luvu & Chinn are gonna ball out in WAs, I’d put a paycheck on letting #0 walk was the correct move…

It's fine.  We have moved on.  That doesn't change his impact no matter the personal opinions of fans. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, j2sgam said:

Burns dismissed his impact before any of us did..
 

all the talk of how good the players we let go do, and while I think Luvu & Chinn are gonna ball out in WAs, I’d put a paycheck on letting #0 walk was the correct move…

we did not let him walk. We traded him

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...