Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wonnum to Panthers


mcsmoak
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Where do you recall seeing those stats? 

Pff has them in their breakdown and has him with a 55 rush grade. Burns was a 75 rush grade. Similar rush defense grades. 
 

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-2024-nfl-free-agency-rankings-edge-defenders

 

the other stats are from a Vikings free agency outlook breakdown

 

hea considered a 3rd down only pass rush rotational player. He shouldn’t be starting at all and should be at least your 3rd de

Edited by carpanfan96
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Pff has them in their breakdown and has him with a 55 rush grade. Burns was a 75 rush grade. Similar rush defense grades. 
 

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-2024-nfl-free-agency-rankings-edge-defenders

 

the other stats are from a Vikings free agency outlook breakdown

Those stats account for the last two years. Burns was much better two years ago (most likely effort related), while Wonnum had a worse year in 2022. 
 

They graded Burns 20 points higher at pass rushing and Wonnum 9 points higher at rush defense over that two year period. 

No one is saying Wonnum is of equal talent to Burns. But he’ll put up 55%+ of Burns pass rush production and likely better rush defense for ~30% cost. 
 

 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The #Panthers FO was right to cut the three vets and avoid the post-June 1 spreading. They have also been smart about either A) signing young vets off their rookie deals or B) signing vets under 30 with connections to the staff. Johnson trade was an obvious flier/outlier with low risk/high reward applications that was justified by opportunity cost. Clowney would obviously be a price and age outlier, too (though he was in Seattle with most of the staff on offense). But the idea of upside or system understanding over simply filling holes with descending talent is evident. Morgan and Tilis are off to a logical, and seemingly thoughtful, start.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Those stats account for the last two years. Burns was much better two years ago (most likely effort related), while Wonnum had a worse year in 2022. 
 

They graded Burns 20 points higher at pass rushing and Wonnum 9 points higher at rush defense over that two year period. 

No one is saying Wonnum is of equal talent to Burns. But he’ll put up 55%+ of Burns pass rush production and likely better rush defense for ~30% cost. 
 

 

The 6.7 and the 9 for win rate and pass rush success was from this past season for DJ. Just this past season. He was ranked 43rd out of 51 pass rushers with 300 rush attempts. 
 

 

https://heavy.com/sports/minnesota-vikings/dj-wonnum-extension-danielle-hunter-davenport/amp/

Edited by carpanfan96
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KBRed said:

Like…I dunno…a monster like Derrick Brown. 

Well, he had an 11% pressure win rate. That ranks him 20th for DTs (and he was playing with Spiderman). Brown made his lunch money during the run last season, but he's no pushover against the pass for a DT. I think it's going to take someone who can generate more pressure on the other side to have a viable pass rush 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Well, he had an 11% pressure win rate. That ranks him 20th for DTs (and he was playing with Spiderman). Brown made his lunch money during the run last season, but he's no pushover against the pass for a DT. I think it's going to take someone who can generate more pressure on the other side to have a viable pass rush 

And who was beside DB most the season? I barely watched lol. Tuttle? A'Shawn should be a little upgrade to what he was working with inside last season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Care to elaborate why you disagree? We kicked the ball off 3 times and we kept the Browns to starting field position of the 22, 27, and 10 (would have been 21 before a penalty). All 3 of those are successes with the modern kickoff rule.
    • Its August so obviously quality options are not there. The question is whether any improvement can be made to the bottom of the depth chart.
    • NFL has a huge amount of parity.  The talent level between most NFL starters outside of the top 5 to 10 guys at a position is very comparable.  2020 worst teams Jacksonville Jaguars - 1-15 (worst record in NFL) New York Jets - 2-14 Cincinnati Bengals - 4-11-1 Atlanta Falcons - 4-12 Houston Texans - 4-12 Carolina Panthers - 5-11 Detroit Lions - 5-11 Philadelphia Eagles - 4-11-1 Los Angeles Chargers - 7-9 Denver Broncos - 5-11 2024 Worst teams New York Giants - 3-14 (tied for worst) Cleveland Browns - 3-14 (tied for worst) Tennessee Titans - 3-14 (tied for worst) New England Patriots - 4-13 Carolina Panthers - 5-12 Jacksonville Jaguars - 4-13 Las Vegas Raiders - 4-13 New York Jets - 5-12 Chicago Bears - 5-12 Arizona Cardinals - 8-9 Bengals, Texans, Lions, Eagles, Broncos and the Jags have all made the the playoffs in the last 3 years. What I'm saying is it's stupid to argue when team is the worst when there is so much parity and the system allows quick turnarounds.    
×
×
  • Create New...