Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Drafting a WR in the 2ND Really A Good Idea?


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

You take the BPA.  TE is not deep. EDGE is not deep. WR is deep. O-Line is deep. There could be some first round talent at WR drop to the second (and we have two high second round picks). That may not happen for O-line. It's not going to happen for TE. Probably not happening for EDGE either. I doubt it happens for CB too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to trust these guys to do it right--not the crackheads who were pulling strings before.  I really do not think they understand talent. 

A WR that has good hands and runs crisp routes that gets separation is not going to bust.  Instead, we were drafting players based on 40 times and active heart rates--zodiac signs and college stats--

Morgan is going to be watching a lot of film---that is what he knows and every successful MLB does it religiously.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We have to trust these guys to do it right--not the crackheads who were pulling strings before.  I really do not think they understand talent. 

A WR that has good hands and runs crisp routes that gets separation is not going to bust.  Instead, we were drafting players based on 40 times and active heart rates--zodiac signs and college stats--

Morgan is going to be watching a lot of film---that is what he knows and every successful MLB does it religiously.

Exactly 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A rookie WR. They showed with Mingo the concept that inexperience is supposed to mentor inexperience. Interesting.

If you can find a player that fits exactly what the WR room is lacking then okay. Yes. An excellent role player would be good. 

With this QB a downfield jump ball guy. Time it out with where the hell they can get to in 2.7 secs and then add flight time for the ball and that is your range. It will almost all be inside 25 yards of the LOS. Find a jump ball guy that can handle that and inside of that. 

I am sure I’m off but there has to be a way to quantify what kind of WR can do those things. We do not have  much striking range.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, chknwing said:

ok ok here me out and stop throwing poo at me.  If the goal is to develop Bryce Young, is brining in a rookie WR the right way to do that or just surround him with good vets?  I'm torn, we need a wr to groom but putting him on the field may hinder Youngs development.

SMH. Just because Fitterer flopped at drafting rookie WRs doesn’t mean a rookie WR will hinder anything. We should be able to get a quality rookie WR in this strong class that can start day 1. Stroud didn’t seem hindered by a rookie WR. Flowers didn’t hurt Lamar and Addison was solid for Cousins especially with JJ out.

We shouldn’t be scared of stuff because our last GM sucked. Still entirely possible we still suck at drafting since we still have the same cogs that were around him. Here’s hoping we learned or that we fired the right guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

We have to trust these guys to do it right--not the crackheads who were pulling strings before.  I really do not think they understand talent. 

A WR that has good hands and runs crisp routes that gets separation is not going to bust.  Instead, we were drafting players based on 40 times and active heart rates--zodiac signs and college stats--

Morgan is going to be watching a lot of film---that is what he knows and every successful MLB does it religiously.

Morgan and Canales know to watch for players who know how to do what they are supposed to do.

How we have been doing things for years going back to even drafting Benjamin and Funchess....they weren't looking at skill and proficiency as much as huge WRs. And then we kind of quit looking at WRs altogether. Well, at least Gettleman wasn't.

With Fitt, instead of size it was that damn RAS score and whatever supermetric they could use. Relying on analytics to tell you who should be drafted. We watched moneyball and fell for that poo.

Morgan trusts his first hand knowledge and those unblinking eyes. He knows what real football players and what makes a guy who can play at a high level because he played with and  against the best for so long.

I think Canales just knows what players have the mentality to push themselves to play at a high level and he can get that to rise to the surface.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, rayzor said:

 

Morgan trusts his first hand knowledge and those unblinking eyes. He knows what real football players and what makes a guy who can play at a high level because he played with and  against the best for so long.

 

Captain Caveman knows a dog when he sees one. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Raptors blown out by Phoenix. Man this final stretch is gonna be crazy. Seeds 5-10 in the east are separated by 2.5 games… Hawks only team “hotter” than us, and I think they’re bound to come back down to earth with a pretty tough schedule to close out the season. We have some tough games too but ones that I think are very winnable, and still some very very easy games — which we have been winning consistently in 2026. Don’t think we’ve had a bad loss against a team we should beat since the Pacers in either very early January or late December
    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
×
×
  • Create New...