Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Dave Tepper would review play call data, review with Reich

TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
FatChad Explorer

FatChad

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

I think as an owner he is allowed to critique and get explanations for play calling post-game.  If anything, I'm glad he is interested in learning more about the game.  I'm sure most if not all owners do this.  

  • Pie 23
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
CanadianCat Mentor

CanadianCat

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
13 minutes ago, FatChad said:

I think as an owner he is allowed to critique and get explanations for play calling post-game.  If anything, I'm glad he is interested in learning more about the game.  I'm sure most if not all owners do this.  

Like FFS I get people here dont like Tepper but lets not make poo up just to fuel that hate. 

Everything Tepper has done this year is positive. Hell even what he did last year in the offseason was positive. I blame Reich more on putting a poor staff together that didnt work then Tepper. All Reich said last offseason was how Tepper allowed them to spend as much money as they needed to build the staff. 

  • Pie 16
  • Beer 9
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Like FFS I get people here dont like Tepper but lets not make poo up just to fuel that hate. 

Everything Tepper has done this year is positive. Hell even what he did last year in the offseason was positive. I blame Reich more on putting a poor staff together that didnt work then Tepper. All Reich said last offseason was how Tepper allowed them to spend as much money as they needed to build the staff. 

I agree with part of this.  However, with all of his faults, I don't think Reich is the one who put his staff together.  I think they were sort of forced on him from what I've read.  Regardless Reich wasn't the guy and it looks like Canales is bringing in his guys this year.  So hopefully that's a lesson learned....

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
travisura Grand Master

travisura

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, FatChad said:

I think as an owner he is allowed to critique and get explanations for play calling post-game.  If anything, I'm glad he is interested in learning more about the game.  I'm sure most if not all owners do this.  

Explanations? Absolutely. Critiques? I just don't trust that he has enough football knowledge to provide meaningful critiques beyond "something's not working, fix it." We have one sentence in a tweet with a screenshot of a write-up that wasn't cited so we need more context about how these meetings went down.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Mentor

strato

Posted
Posted

I didn’t read it, but on the general idea that it is some sort of travesty, I don’t know if I care.

If I were an owner I’d feel justified requesting they run a play for me. I think most plays rely more on execution than anything. IOW any play can be good or bad. 

 

Just stay the hell out of talent evaluations and roster construction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChuckWag78 Experienced

ChuckWag78

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, FatChad said:

I think as an owner he is allowed to critique and get explanations for play calling post-game.  If anything, I'm glad he is interested in learning more about the game.  I'm sure most if not all owners do this.  

Nailed it right on the head. This can good for both parties development. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SaltAndPepper Proficient

SaltAndPepper

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, FatChad said:

I think as an owner he is allowed to critique and get explanations for play calling post-game.  If anything, I'm glad he is interested in learning more about the game.  I'm sure most if not all owners do this.  

found teppers burner

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CPF4LIFE
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB.
    • CRA
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CRA · Posted

      Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.  And last year was asked to be what he was.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
    • ForJimmy
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut?  Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks. 
×
×
  • Create New...